December 15, 2006

Published December 15, 2006, issue of December 15, 2006.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Boston Study Question Did Not Bias Results

As the principal researchers who conducted the recently released Boston Jewish community study, we appreciate the comments by opinion writers Steven M. Cohen, Jack Ukeles and Ron Miller regarding our finding that the majority of children in intermarried homes are being raised as Jews (“Read Boston Study on Intermarriage With Caution,” December 8). We concur that there are likely other communities that have had similar success as Boston, but we take issue with the view that our question may have resulted in a bias.

Our colleagues suggest that because we did not ask directly whether parents were raising their children “Jewish and something else,” our conclusions are inaccurate. In fact, our question — that asked parents to identify in which “religion” that they are raising their children and allowed for multiple responses — creates a more stringent criterion for Jewish identification. In contrast, Ukeles and Miller ask about childrearing only in terms of Jewish identification, not religion, in their studies of Jewish communities.

Evidence that our question did not bias the results is provided by our respondents’ description of the Jewish education their children are receiving. Children of in-married and intermarried families are just as likely to receive formal Jewish education. (Children of intermarried parents are, however, less likely to continue after bar mitzvah.)

Cohen and his colleagues encourage those who read the Boston findings to interpret them with caution. In general, that is a good prescription for dealing with social science. In the case of the Boston study, we hope that the quantitative findings do not divert attention from efforts to understand how to engage Jews of all backgrounds.

Leonard Saxe
Principal Investigator

Charles Kadushin
Senior Methodologist

Benjamin Phillips
Project Manager

Steinhardt Social Research Institute
Brandeis University
Waltham, Mass.

How About Drawing Burlesque Comics?

I hope that cartoonist Drew Friedman didn’t overlook those comics who toured the Burlesque circuits (“Legendary Laughs,” December 1). My favorites were Herbie Faye and Mike Sachs. Mike was blind, and worked with his lady friend Alice Kennedy.

This was my favorite laugh: Alice would innocently reach into Mike’s pocket for a handkerchief. She would yank out her hand, with a loud shriek, hollered: “What have you got in your pocket?!”

Mike would look out at the audience, with an angelic look on his face, and answer: “So… who’s got pockets?”

Irv Jacobs
La Mesa, Calif.

John Bolton’s Departure Is a Lamentable Loss

A December 8 editorial screed against John Bolton and Jewish organizations for supporting him is particularly astonishing for getting wrong assessments both of the community’s interests and what Bolton did at the United Nations (“Dear John”).

Probably the most absurd part was the Forward’s criticism of American Jews for seeing defense of Israel as its No. 1 issue. This comment is especially egregious when it comes to the U.N., for if American Jews are not to think about U.N. policy toward Israel as a priority — considering the very dangerous directions the U.N. would go in if not for the United States — then what you are doing is asking the community not to care about its own interests.

In terms of the Israel agenda, Bolton was not just another ambassador. He not only voted the right way on Israel, he was a leader and a strong voice for Israel at a difficult time, and his role in bringing about Resolution 1701 at the end of the war in Lebanon was a significant personal accomplishment.

None of which is to say that American Jews only care about Israel. We think U.N. reform is important for America’s interest and for world peace.

As to your criticism of Bolton on U.N. reform, his so-called “inflexibility” is looking better all the time as we observe the work of the allegedly reformed Human Rights Council. Rather than being rigid, Bolton demanded real change and not a facade of change. Anyone who is serious about U.N. reform and serious about fairness and values that we hold dear will have to pay attention to Bolton’s words.

American Jews were right to lament Bolton’s departure. We have lost a reliable friend, one who sought to make the U.N. a more hospitable place to value of fairness and balance that most Americans hold dear.

Abraham Foxman
National Director
Anti-Defamation League
New York, N.Y.

Secular Humanism Addresses Spirituality

In a December 8 opinion column, Leonard Fein somewhat dismissively refers to “something called ‘The Center for Inquiry’” and nowhere in the piece does he use the words “secular humanism” (“The Questions That Might Otherwise Be Lost”).

The Center for Inquiry is a worldwide secular humanist organization, supported by world-renowned philosophers, scientists and other academics as well as common folk like myself. As with other similar organizations, it advocates and promotes the furthering of humanistic values and actions, unencumbered by the myths and apologetics of ancient and present religion.

Yes, in the ever-ongoing pursuit for answers to the very questions that concern Fein, science is relied upon as a method of rational investigation. But to insinuate that secular humanism is constrained by cold or reductionist scientism is plain wrong. An unbiased glimpse of its writings and teachings will show that everything human is addressed, including the longing for mystery and spiritualism.

Secular humanists approach the world with an emphasis on discovery and the betterment of humanity, for the individual and collective. Its quarrel with religion concerns the roadblocks that religious dogma present, both to its own brilliant and talented adherents and to secular humanism.

Philip Brogadir
Williamsville, N.Y.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Sigal Samuel started their Dixie road trip in Birmingham, Alabama, where the cab driver has a Bible on his seat and tells them his daddy taught him to respect the Jews. They're sure 'nuff feeling 'chosen'
  • Why Jewish artists continue to be inspired by the Bible:
  • When filmmaker Nasya Kamrat sought for a way to commemorate the story of her grandfather, a Polish Holocaust survivor, she had an unusual idea: use his paintings for an animated Holocaust documentary.
  • As part of the Forward's 50-state project, Anne Cohen and Sigal Samuel are setting out on a journey through Dixie. To get you in the mood, here’s a brief history of Jewish road trips:
  • "1. Sex. She had it. She liked it. She didn’t make a big deal of it." What were your favorite Elaine moments on Seinfeld?
  • "Mamie Eisenhower had one, and if you came of age during the 1950s, chances are you had one, too. I’m referring to the charm bracelet, that metallic cluster of miniaturized icons that hung from, and often strained, the wrist of every self-respecting, well-dressed woman in postwar America." Do you have charm bracelet memories? Share them with us!
  • How the Gaza War started — and how it can end:
  • This could be the first ancient synagogue mosaic to feature a non-biblical narrative.
  • "Suddenly we heard a siren, but it was very faint. We pulled the kids out of the pool, and then we heard a big boom."
  • Why the bloody onslaught in Gaza is built on politics and lies: Read and share this explosive insight from J.J. Goldberg.
  • The crisis in Israel caught two interns — an Israeli and a Palestinian — far from home. Guess what? They're still friends.
  • The gang's all here!
  • "Neither the 'blood feud' nor the 'honor killing' theory of Abu Khdeir's murder ever made sense — and their manufacture constituted a blood libel against all Palestinians." What do you think?
  • Why hasn't the Zionist Organization of American condemned the revenge killing of Mohammed Abu Khdeir?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.