Skip To Content

Judge Dismisses Much Of Woody Allen’s Amazon Case

Woody Allen’s $68 million lawsuit against Amazon suffered a major setback July 31, as much of the director’s case was dismissed.

In a decision filed Wednesday, a federal judge in New York ruled that four of Allen’s claims against Amazon Studios should be tossed out, Deadline reported. Siding with Amazon on a partial motion to dismiss, Judge Denise Cote gutted much of Allen’s complaint from February, handicapping his further action to move against the retail and streaming giant.

Allen’s premise for suing Amazon over the ending of their four-picture deal stated that the studio had “no legitimate ground” to step away from their agreement based on resurfaced allegations of sexual abuse brought by his daughter Dylan Farrow (allegations he denies). But Amazon argued that the director’s statements about Harvey Weinstein and the #MeToo movement sabotaged his films, creating a PR nightmare.

In her decision, Cote rejected the contention made in Allen’s claim that the cancellation of his Multipicture Acquisition Agreement (MAA) with Amazon prevented him from meeting his financial obligations with investors and foreign distributors. Other charges, including a breach of “assumed covenant of good faith and fair dealing” unfair enrichment were ruled redundant of the MAA claim and also scrapped.

Allen can still pursue his action for individual films, notably “A Rainy Day in New York,” which the studio shelved, but not the multi-picture deal overall.

According to The Hollywood Reporter the case moves ahead with discovery scheduled to wrap by November 1. Amazon is hoping to court some A-List names in its defense, drawing on a list of Hollywood insiders who have distanced themselves from the director.

Meanwhile, Allen continues to work, filming a new picture with the working title of “Rifkin’s Festival” in San Sebastian, Spain.

PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture fellow. He can be reached at [email protected].

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.