Skip To Content
Fast Forward

Sheryl Sandberg: Teens Who Downloaded Controversial App ‘Consented’

Sheryl Sandberg said in an interview Wednesday that teenagers who downloaded a controversial data collection program created by Facebook knew what they were downloading, Gizmodo reported.

The program, created by Facebook’s market research team, was marketed to — and downloaded by — users as young as 13, TechCrunch reported. Once downloaded onto a user’s phone, it created a virtual private network, or VPN, that allowed Facebook to track nearly everything users did on their phone, from internet browsing activity to private messages. Users who downloaded the app were paid to do so.

When Apple found out about the app, it cut off Facebook’s access to in-progress versions of its own apps.

“This is a Facebook Research app,” Sandberg said on CNBC Wednesday. “It’s very clear to the people who participated. It’s completely opt-in. There is a rigorous consent flow and people are compensated. It’s a market research program.”

“Now, that said, we know we have work to do to make sure people’s data is protected,” Sandberg added.

Sandberg also said that Facebook yanked the controversial app after concerns were raised about its overbearing data collection, contradicting statements from Apple that it removed the app itself. Business Insider also reported internal Facebook communications that suggest Facebook was not at all prepared for Apple’s response to discovering the extent of the Facebook app’s data collection.

Gizmodo also noted that, despite Sandberg’s statements, “legal minors [under 18] cannot sign contracts without parental or guardian consent.” The article noted that both the Pew Research Center and the Nielsen ratings system had much more “rigorous consent flows” than Facebook, requiring affirmative consent from a legal guardian to collect polling or viewer data on legal minors.

Ari Feldman is a staff writer at the Forward. Contact him at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter @aefeldman

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.