Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Fast Forward

Libraries may need ‘a book that disputes the Holocaust,’ Washington school employee says

The comment was the latest incident in which the Holocaust has been caught up in the rancor over public school curriculums

A suburban Seattle school district employee said Thursday that if the district chose to carry books about the Holocaust “you have to be willing to have a book that disputes the Holocaust.”

Pamela Hawley, who was introduced during a meeting of the Kent School District Board as a “policy coordinator” but is listed in the school’s staff director as an executive assistant, made the comment during a meeting to discuss revising the system’s library policy following months of rancor over whether to ban LGBT books.

Gavin Downing, a high school librarian in the district, pushed back on Hawley’s statement on Twitter.

“You don’t need to give facts and misinformation the same platform, especially in a school library,” Downing said. “These things are not the same.”

The incident is the latest in which teaching materials about the Holocaust have been swept up in debates over how schools are teaching about gender, sexuality and race. The rancor has been fueled by conservative parents and activists who want to eliminate discussions of race and racism, and of sexual orientation, from public school classrooms, or “balance” them to reflect their views.

The Holocaust has often been held up by critics as an example of history for which it should be impossible to teach contrasting perspectives, but in several recent incidents, public officials have challenged the presumption.

An administrator at a school district in Texas said last year that in order to comply with a new state law that required teachers to offer multiple perspectives when talking about “widely debated and currently controversial” issues, they would need to offer students “opposing” perspectives on the Holocaust.

That same month a state lawmaker in Texas included an anthology about women’s experiences during the Holocaust among more than 800 books in public school libraries that could cause students to feel “discomfort, guilt, anguish, or any other form of psychological distress,” and which he wanted investigated. 

In March, a legislator in Ohio called for legislation similar to the Texas law requiring “divisive concepts” — including the Holocaust — to be taught from multiple perspectives.

“Maybe you’re listening to it from the perspective of a Jewish person that has gone through the tragedies that took place,” said State Rep. Sarah Fowler Arthur. “And maybe you’ll listen to it from the perspective of a German soldier.”

Hawley’s remarks at the Kent school district meeting came as officials try to craft a uniform policy for its system of libraries after a principal sought to remove several books dealing with LGBT issues from a library. A district committee subsequently voted to remove one of the books from the library, but the full school board rejected that decision.

The board is now trying to set a new policy, and Hawley presented their choice as between offering books closely aligned with curriculums and allowing a more expansive selection where students could learn about topics unrelated to what they learn in class.

She cautioned that “if you are thinking broadly, and you think that it’s OK to have books about the Holocaust — as I mentioned before — in the library for students, you have to be willing to have a book that disputes the Holocaust if you’re going to say that you’re broadly minded.”

“That’s part of the challenge here,” said Hawley.

No members of the board appeared to directly address Hawley’s comments about the Holocaust, although one sighed and said, “oh boy” before the discussion moved on.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.