Newsom came under fire from Jewish leaders over earlier comments about Israel. Photo by Photo by Steve Jennings/Getty Images

By Louis Keene March 24, 2026

California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a new interview that he now regrets his use of the word “apartheid” earlier this month, clarifying a comment that had ignited a backlash among Jewish Democratic supporters.

But in a fuller overview of his feelings about Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Newsom — a likely 2028 presidential candidate — demurred when asked whether he identified as Zionist, saying instead that he reveres Israel and is proud to support it.

The new comments, which Newsom made on the Politico podcast On the Road with Jonathan Martin, followed vocal demands by Jewish leaders to clarify his use of a word they see as unfair or offensive in the Israeli context. And they added to a wider conversation about Israel among Democratic elected officials as support for Israel plummets in the party.

Newsom had said March 5 on the Pod Save America podcast that Israel had been talked about “appropriately as sort of an apartheid state,” referencing New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman’s assertion that annexing the West Bank would “make today’s Israel permanently indistinguishable from apartheid South Africa.” Newsom added in that appearance that a time may come when the U.S. should reconsider its military aid to Israel.

Coming from a leader seen by some as a Democratic party bellwether, the comments had appeared to shift the conversation leftward, alarming Jewish Democrats who viewed Newsom as a longtime ally.

Speaking to Martin, Newsom was asked whether he considered himself Zionist.

“Do I consider myself Zionist? I revere the state of Israel. I’m proud to support the state of Israel,” Newsom told Martin. “I deeply, deeply oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s leadership, his opposition to the two-state solution, and deeply oppose how he is indulging the far-right as it relates to what’s going on in the West Bank.”

Martin followed up by asking the term-limited governor whether he regretted the apartheid comment.

“I do in this context,” Newsom said. “I said it and I referenced why I used it — a Tom Friedman article, in that same sentence, where Tom used it in the context of the direction that Bibi is going.”

“Not the current state?” Martin asked.

“Correct,” Newsom said, “and that is a legitimate concern I have, that I share with Tom, that that direction — that if that vision and direction of the far right that Bibi is indulging, that if they see the full annexation of the West Bank, then that’s not something — then that’s a word you may hear others use.”

Whereas Newsom’s earlier comments had excited the party’s left flank, his interview with Martin reflected the Jewish Democratic standard for criticism of Israel — promoting a two-state solution, opposing annexation and challenging Netanyahu.

This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.

We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover.

This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.

With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.

The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.

Don't just read the Forward - invest in it. Make a gift today.

Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Support Our Work