Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Life

Divorcing Settlement Expansion From a Two-State Solution

Outside of Israel, the opinions tend to follow one another — those who are keen to see a two-state solution between the Israelis and Palestinians tend to be concerned about settlement building. In Israel, a new poll indicates, the two positions don’t necessarily go together.

The War and Peace Index, a monthly public opinion survey by Tel Aviv University, found that 64% of the Jewish public in Israel is for a two-state solution, while almost the same number of people, 60% of the Jewish population, thinks that continued building in the settlements won’t affect the changes of it happening.

Breaking down the results, of those who are for a two-state solution, some 54% are not concerned about continued building. This points to a dichotomy between the way Israelis and other see the peace process, with settlement building perceived within Israel as a smaller threat to the two-state solution than it is outside Israel.

This could be for a couple of reasons. It may just be because Israelis consider other problems with the peace process, such as questions about whether Israel has a partner for negotiations, as the key challenges to the peace process while settlements can be dismantled if the time comes. The other possible reason is that much of the building taking place today is within the so-called settlement “blocs” that are expected to be Israeli after any peace agreement, and as such doubt that building there affects the possibility of reaching an agreement.

The War and Peace Index also found a massive discrepancy in knowledge about the Goldstone Report between the Jewish and Arab citizens of Israel. Three out of five Jewish Israelis said they know what the report’s main conclusion was while only one in five Israeli Arabs said they knew. Among the Jewish interviewees who responded that they are aware of the report’s main conclusion, some 93.5% said that the report was biased against the Israel Defense Forces.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version