Women cannot win.

If we have children, we are criticized about the way we raise them, how many of them we have and who they turn out to be. If we don’t have them, we are pathologized, essentialized and told that we don’t know what we want. Most insidious, I think, is when these painful attacks comes from other women. In her recent Sisterhood piece, “Why Being ‘Childless by Choice’ Often Reflects Jewish Disengagement,” Debra Nussbaum Cohen contemplates the ability of Jewish women who elect not to have children to be active members of Jewish communities.

For me, this piece zeroes in one of my worst fears as a Jewish woman who has made the choice not to have children — the accusation that because of a very personal choice that I have made, my Jewish commitment will never be sufficient. This is what we do to each other, Jews, we compete with one another to be “enough”: religious enough, Zionist enough, and in this case, to have enough children, or any.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

By targeting women who are childless by choice, we are letting men off the hook, and creating a rigid binary where women are responsible for nurturing family and Jewish values, and men for learning and supporting the Jewish home. The result of this is a Jewish community that is incapable of tolerating varied gender roles, family structures and, ultimately, change.

Judaism at its core is dynamic and pluralistic, and can actually accommodate various decisions and circumstances that face us as a modern people. A powerful example is found in the “From the Expert” section of The Wedding Yentas, a website for Jewish brides. In the ketubot category, artist Rachel Deitsch discusses adapting the wedding contract to fit the wishes of the couple. “For instance, one of my popular texts refers to future children. Some couples know that this is not their plan and I’m happy to remove the sentence — no worries.”

If we are really serious about imagining a Jewish future, we must be able to re-envision the Jewish family, and not limit ourselves to what exists in the communities where we feel the most comfortable. We should not target those who make choices outside of the realm of our understanding if our goal is to secure the commitment of a new (and current) generation of Jews. When Nussbaum Cohen references “those who, through annihilation or assimilation, would see the Jewish people winnowed away to nothing,” she might also consider the consequences we face when we criticize the way others live their Jewish lives and values.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount