Why European ‘Headscarf Ban’ Hurts Integration
Women in Rome. Image by Getty Images
A European Union court ruling on Tuesday permitting workplaces to ban religious attire drew criticism from rabbis. At The Pool, Samira Shackle explains how, precisely, the ban is discriminatory:
The ruling on religious symbols doesn’t create a new prejudice – it doesn’t magic out of nowhere a barrier to entering the workforce. It legitimises and enforces one that already exists, and strips away part of the legal protection against these existing biases. Muslim women are already the most economically disadvantaged group in the UK, a pattern which is mirrored in other parts of Europe. The debate around the cloth that Muslim women choose to wear (or not) frequently involves hand-wringing over their oppression at the hands of Muslim men, but this is utterly tone deaf if it is superseded by discrimination and barriers to participation from mainstream society.
Shackle notes that hijab-wearers face bigotry, but rightly suggests that adding a further obstacle to Muslim women’s lives won’t help matters: “If integration is indeed the ultimate goal, enforcing barriers to participating in the workforce is hardly the best way of going about it.” Precisely.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of The Perils of “Privilege”, from St. Martin’s Press.
Did you know that only 2% of Forward readers donate to support our nonprofit newsroom? That 2% make it possible for millions to read the Forward without a paywall or subscription — removing any barriers to the full and fair Jewish story.
But while the Forward is free to read, it isn’t free to produce. Big stories — like deep dives into the antisemitism data, political scoops or reporting trips to college campuses — take months of research and fact-checking. All while we keep you informed of what you need to know each day.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Forward Publisher & CEO
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
