David Schoen made a public display of covering his head while at Donald Trump's impeachment trial. by the Forward

Heading to controversy: Impeachment trial yarmulke debate ignites Twitter

Courtesy of C-SPAN

Twitter erupted on Tuesday afternoon with the most existential of Jewish questions: Can a hand substitute for a yarmulke?

The hoopla and hullabaloo began when David Schoen, the modern Orthodox attorney representing Donald Trump at his second impeachment trial, was making his case in front of the Senate. He grabbed the unmarked 8 oz. bottle of water to take a drink and – voila! – while one hand was holding the bottle, the other went straight to cover his head.

Channeling what was certainly on everyone’s minds, er, heads, CNN anchor Jake Tapper posed the question to Jacob Kornbluh, the Forward’s Senior Political Reporter.

Not since Schoen’s client took a two-handed sip of agua has a display of thirst-slaking generated so much interest. Within minutes, “He’s Jewish” began trending on Twitter.

It turns out that Schoen’s gesture poses a halachic head scratcher.

One reader directed us to the ruling by the Terumat HaDeshen, the famous 15th century Talmudist, that putting a hand on one’s head does not suffice to be able to recite a blessing, since one’s hand is not considered a yarmulke. However, one’s friend’s hand or sleeve is acceptable. The 17th century Polish Torah scholar known as the Bach, however, rules that one’s sleeve is acceptable.

On the C-SPAN live feed, Schoen is clearly seen using his bare hand, while his sleeve remained several inches from the tip of his dome.

Eagle-eyed sleuths slowed down the video as if they were studying the Zapruder film. Did Schoen, in fact, have the water bottle cap nestled into the palm of his right hand? If so, would that count as a tiny plastic yarmulke?

More questions arose: Should we be calling it a yarmulke? A kippah? A skullcap? Could he have grabbed a tissue and, if so, would it need to be double-ply? Did he perhaps think he had his yarmulke on and was merely reaching to keep it from falling off? And why wasn’t he wearing the yarmulke to begin with, allowing him to have both hands available to argue his case? Many modern Orthodox Jews choose not to wear a yarmulke in business settings, but will often put one on while eating, drinking or reciting a prayer.

When asked about the issue by CNN on Tuesday evening, Schoen explained why he wasn’t wearing a yarmulke. “I just wasn’t sure if it was appropriate,” he said. “I didn’t want to offend anyone.” He added: “It’s just an awkward thing and people stare at it.”

Schoen’s religiosity played a part in the impeachment trial even before “The Great Kippah Debate of 2021.” Earlier this month, he requested that the trial pause at sundown on Friday so that he could observe the Sabbath. Late Monday, he retracted that request, saying that his co-counselors could fill in for him.

After hours of scrolling through Twitter to parse the hairy situation, it seems social media users could all agree on one thing: thanking Jake Tapper for bringing it to our attention.

Authors

PJ Grisar

PJ Grisar

PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture reporter. He can be reached at Grisar@Forward.com.

Jacob Kornbluh

Jacob Kornbluh

Jacob Kornbluh is the Forward’s senior political reporter. Follow him on Twitter @jacobkornbluh or email kornbluh@forward.com.

Benyamin Cohen

Benyamin Cohen

Benyamin Cohen is the News Director at The Forward. Follow him on Twitter @benyamincohen.

Heading to controversy: Impeachment trial yarmulke debate ignites Twitter

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Heading to controversy: Impeachment trial yarmulke debate ignites Twitter

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close