GOP Candidates Take Hard Line on Iran
Ron Paul Image by getty images
Josh Nathan-Kazis January 3, 2012
With Iowa’s caucuses set for tonight, Republican hopefuls are doubling down on their rhetoric on the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear ambitions in an apparent effort to distance themselves from GOP candidate Ron Paul.
Front-runner Mitt Romney, dark horse Michele Bachmann, and the late-surging Rick Santorum all promised a readiness to launch military strikes on Iran if sanctions failed to stifle the country’s alleged nuclear program.
Their threats are in stark contrast to the position of Paul, who is close to the lead in most Iowa polls. Paul opposes a military strike on Iran, telling voters January 30 that the Iranians “don’t threaten our national security.”
“The reason that they’re talking about it now is that the vast majority of Republican primary voters and caucus voters are very passionate about this issue,” Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi of The Israel Project told the Forward. “It’s become a real litmus test and a real values tests, and there is real difference between the candidates.”
On NBC’s Meet the Press on January 1, Santorum said that if he were elected and Iran failed to open its nuclear facilities, he would “degrade those facilities through airstrikes and make it very public that we are doing that.”
Bachmann told CBS News on January 2 that Paul “has no problem with Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon.” Bachmann went on to say that she would launch a blockade and deploy missile systems against Iran if she were president.
Romney called Iran “the greatest danger that America faces” on December 31.
The GOP candidates may be seeking to defuse fallout from their declarations that they would support Paul in the unlikely event he became the nominee, despite his isolationist foreign policy positions.
The threats came the same weekend that President Obama signed a bill authorizing harsh sanctions against Iran, focusing on the country’s central bank.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
