Mike Pence Just Redefined What It Means To Be ‘Pro-Israel’
Welcome back to Jane Looking Forward. If you wish to continue reading this weekly newsletter, please subscribe here. And spread the word!
With his long, formally delivered speech before the Israeli Knesset today, Vice President Mike Pence has dramatically redefined what it means for an American administration to be “pro-Israel.”
I’m not a fan of the term in any case, because there are many ways to love and support Israel, and no one leader or group should be allowed to define that for everyone, everywhere. Yet it has, unfortunately, become a litmus test in too much of the American Jewish community, and that test just became more limited and more faith-based with the vice president’s speech.
His new definition starts with some revisionist history. “In the story of the Jews, we’ve always seen the story of America,” he began, recounting a few key moments when Jews were welcomed and their religion praised by early white settlers and subsequent leaders — forgetting, of course, the blasphemy laws, the social discrimination, the refugees turned away, and other moments of pure prejudice strewn through America’s beginning centuries.
In other words, to be “pro-Israel” is to be a certain kind of “pro-American,” in the past and forever more.
Pence’s speech then goes on to reflect his worldview, which is completely in sync with his particular brand of Christian evangelicalism, and leads him to view everything through a strict, biblical lens. I can’t imagine what the secular, avowedly socialist Zionist pioneers would think of his messianic description of the founding of Eretz Israel.
Policy-wise, Pence’s new form of “pro-Israel” is devoid of even a hint of criticism of the Israeli government or the kind of warnings that good friends offer good friends. The word “settlement” never came up. But Iran did, a lot.
And, of course, Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, a unilateral designation President Trump made last month, breaking with decades of American foreign policy.
This is all a huge concern, of course, because Pence and his compatriots are driving Israel policy in the Trump administration, as I explained here, replacing a bipartisan, pluralistic approach with one based on one religious perspective and anchored in one political party.
When that policy becomes more Christian, it becomes less Jewish; as ‘pro-Israel’ becomes synonymous with conservative Republicans, American Jews — still largely identified with the Democratic party — will move away. That disconnect is highlighted in the divergent attitude towards the Jerusalem decision, which Pence hailed today as if he was announcing a great deliverance. Yet a survey released last September by the American Jewish Committee found that only 16% of those polled wanted the U.S. to move its embassy to Jerusalem immediately. Thirty-six percent only wanted it moved in conjunction with the Palestinians, and 44% not at all.
This is the AJC, remember, an establishment voice. While Trump’s Jerusalem decision may be wildly popular in Israel, it is not supported by most American Jews. It is, however, a long-standing dream of certain evangelical Christians and right now, that’s who counts.
In his first, tumultuous year in office, President Trump and his administration have attempted to redefine what it means to be a good American, to disastrous results. They are now applying the same crude measure to support for Israel. What gives them the right to decide?
What else I’m writing. As the landmark decision in Roe v. Wade marks its 45th anniversary today, I argue that it’s been largely misunderstood as guaranteeing an unfettered right to abortion when the ruling is wiser and more nuanced than that simple formulation. Read about why we are still having the wrong conversation about abortion rights four and a half decades later.
And last week, after Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas gave two incendiary speeches, I felt that I had to condemn his indefensible words.
For a fuller understanding of what’s happened to Abbas, I recommend Grant Rumley’s timely, heartbreaking piece in The Atlantic.
What else I’ve been reading. A remarkable scene has taken place over several days in a Michigan courtroom: woman after woman recalling the sexual abuse she suffered by Dr. Lawrence G. Nassar, the former USA Gymnastics team doctor and a respected medical professional. Most riveting was the lengthy, searing statement given by Aly Raisman, two-time Olympian and darling of the American Jewish community. The New York Times printed her statement in full, and posted it online here.
Not only did Raisman recount the trauma of her abuse, she excoriated the gymnastics and Olympics organizations that did nothing to stop Nassar’s assaults on what appears to be more than a hundred women. It’s an extraordinary statement. Read it.
Looking forward. To say that I’m getting excited and nervous about my interview next week with Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a little like say the Patriots are going to the Super Bowl. I am! And they are — though as a former Philadelphian, I’m a little torn.
But forget football. Read Jenny Singer’s delightful piece about RBG’s #MeToo moment. And visit our special tag page, to send me questions to ask the justice, and to sign up for a watch party of your own. It will be just like the Big Game, only with two short, slight Jewish women talking.
Remember to email me at [email protected] with your questions and concerns.
I’ve had lots of warm responses to Jane Looking Forward. If you’d like to invite someone to this newsletter community, here’s the link to sign-up. Thank you!