Joe Biden Needs To Apologize
Image by Getty Images
Lev Golinkin September 27, 2018
The ongoing scandal over Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the Supreme Court brings back echoes of the shameful treatment of Anita Hill during her 1991 testimony at the confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas. The parallels between the two hearings are a litmus test for how much Washington has progressed in the intervening twenty-seven years.
The biggest disappointment thus far has been Joe Biden, who chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee when Hill testified. Today, with the benefit of nearly three decades of hindsight, the best Biden could do was say that Hill was “vilified” and that “I wish I could’ve done more to prevent those questions, the way they asked them.”
“I wish I could’ve done more,” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that statement.
Lest we forget, Hill wasn’t just vilified during her testimony; the woman was subjected to a prolonged and brutal campaign aimed to punish her, a campaign best encapsulated by professional smear artist David Brock’s catchy quip about Hill being “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty.”
Twenty-seven years later, Biden’s efforts at assembling an apology to Hill can best be described as a little bit trying, and a little bit lying.
Biden’s implication that he had done all he could’ve done for Hill is simply untrue. His failure has been exhaustively covered, with the most damning evidence being his decision to not call three additional witnesses who were prepared to corroborate Hill’s assertions about Thomas’ harassment of women. Investigative journalists Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson wrote a book about it, Strange Justice: the Selling of Clarence Thomas, which was a National Book Award finalist.
Biden could’ve done better. He should’ve done better. By implying that he had done all he could for Hill, he’s demonstrating a refusal to accept responsibility, along with a generous dose of historical revisionism.
These are also the go-to defenses of the Donald Trump White House.
It may seem unfair to focus on Biden, who drafted the Violence Against Women Act, spoke eloquently on behalf of the victim of Brock Turner’s Stanford rape, and had long been seen as a champion of women. Biden’s certainly far from being the worst threat to women, and appears to genuinely support women’s rights.
But that’s precisely why his actions here matter.
The seminal moment in most social justice movements comes not from far left progressives, not from conservatives, but from the center left, the ones who are generally supportive, but may not be willing to put themselves out there for a cause.
Feminists don’t need to shift; they’re already in the vanguard of women’s rights. And no one expects Trump and his supporters to have an epiphany. But Biden, who’s perfectly positioned between the Thomas and Kavanaugh hearings, can have immense impact, by rising to the occasion and doing what Hill insists he has never done before: saying sorry.
It’s an extraordinary opportunity for a bit of reconciliation at a moment when the country sure could use it.
For the past three years, it feels as if America had turned itself into a stifling crockpot, with endless accusations, counter accusations, sick burns and whatabouts stewing and swirling with each turn of the news cycle.
Biden could crack open a little ventilation window simply by apologizing to Hill without tossing in disingenuous addenda.
It’d be on brand, too: Biden’s long been portrayed as a simple, decent guy. “I’m sorry, I should’ve done more,” sure seems like a simple, decent thing to say.
Lev Golinkin is the author of “A Backpack, a Bear, and Eight Crates of Vodka.”
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse..
Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
