Linda Sarsour and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by the Forward

Linda Sarsour And Bibi Netanyahu Are In A Cat Fight About Jesus. Don’t Engage.

Not all fights are worth having. Some things don’t matter. Others are puerile and ought to be beneath rational adult discourse. If a fellow adult approaches you on the street, looks you straight in the eye and tells you that his daddy is richer, stronger, more attractive than, or otherwise superior to your daddy, the proper response is none at all.

This intuitive wisdom, usually learned on the playground, is often blithely ignored in clashes over politics and identity. Some if it can be chalked up to what I’ve started calling McFly’s Law - the almost irrepressible desire to respond to any affront, regardless of how silly it is, lest it go visibly unanswered. In other cases it is more inexplicable.

Opinion | Linda Sarsour And Bibi Netanyahu Are In A Cat Fight About Jesus. Don’t Engage.

But in the case of the Israelis and the Palestinians, this irrational aversion to looking away takes on a hysterical and existential ardor. It is a reflection of the fetishization of the conflict and dangerous fantasies of total victory, and with that the obviation of any need to compromise. The conflict ceases to be a local tragedy and transforms into a pervasive force that penetrates seemingly unrelated areas of contemporary life, history, and culture.

For example: What else could have compelled Linda Sarsour to say this weekend that Jesus Christ was a Palestinian, apparently in response to Bishop Talbert Swan asserting he was black?

Palestinian-Arab identity obviously does not date to antiquity. As Sarsour later modified, Jesus was born in what is today occupied Palestinian territory. It doesn’t strain the imagination to conclude her intent was political and not academic - to infuse her people’s struggle into the story of the Jesus.

In this view, the struggle is cosmic and brooks no barrier, not even time itself; the suggestion that anyone born in Bethlehem could not be a Palestinian is problematic and must be addressed forthwith.

Similarly, in the pro-Israel variant of this reasoning, the idea that another people may have equal entitlement to live in Eretz Yisrael is a threat to Israel’s legitimacy as a Jewish state. To them, Sarsour’s comment about Jesus was not merely a whimsical faux pas; it was another shot in a long-running war, to which an obnoxious response, even on a holiday weekend, was absolutely necessary.

The Israeli government, rather than keep to the Zionist tradition of desiring the status of a normal country (like Albania, as Chaim Weizmann put it), is more than happy to encourage its supporters to view the state as an exceptional aberration in the international system, one whose superior legitimacy must constantly be demonstrated for the world to see.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bizarre tweet storm asserting that DNA and archaeological evidence proved that Palestinians have an inferior connection to the land is another case in point.

It was very obviously a response to the Sarsour controversy to which his son, Yair, had weighed in the evening before. Liberal Zionists were horrified, but it was pure catnip for the victory crowd.

It doesn’t matter to them that scholars reject his interpretation of the evidence — indeed, to Netanyahu’s American supporters this will probably be counted in his favor. Trifles like accuracy and integrity are luxuries in an existential clash.

I can only hope we one day move past all this pablum. Palestinians are entitled to human, civil and, yes, national rights regardless of how exactly they came to populate the land in the centuries leading up to 1948. Israel is a nuclear-armed regional power whose existence is not endangered by the Brooklyn-based Sarsour or the legitimate Palestinian claim to national self-determination.

Unfortunately, this probably won’t happen anytime soon. The next unnecessary controversy is surely around the corner. Inevitably, the losers will be Palestinians and Israelis who are encouraged to eschew compromise and pursue the fantasy of total victory. Those of us who have not lost our sense of proportion have an obligation to push back. And sometimes pushing back means not engaging at all.

Abe Silberstein is a freelance commentator on Israeli politics and U.S.-Israel relations. His work has previously been published in the New York Times, Haaretz, +972 Magazine and the Forward.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Linda Sarsour And Bibi Netanyahu Are In A Cat Fight About Jesus. Don’t Engage.

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close