Image by Getty Images

Dear Editor,

I saw the retraction of the Elie Wiesel story. It is very difficult to read such a terse and vague statement and not worry that perhaps it isn’t about journalistic standards as opposed to threats by powerful people. I have no opinions on the subject personally, I don’t know the author and did not know Wiesel. I am just concerned about whether a potential victim was thrown under a bus or not. I am sorry to put it so bluntly, but I think you really need to be a little more aboveboard on this one with whether you learned of factual discrepancies or evidence against the author’s claim or whether it was for “some other reason.” I guess, if it is the latter, you are between a rock and a hard place, since you can’t say, but still, the matter as is leaves some of us in a difficult position with regard to what we are supposed to say/think about the Forward.

At least on my own Facebook feed, the retraction is taken as evidence that you guys figured out she was lying or delusional, or at least very likely not accurate (something like “there was no dinner,” “Weisel wasn’t there,” “no such picture was ever taken,” “her husband denies that she ever told them about this,” etc.), and pulled the piece. As I said, I couldn’t tell if it was that or a response from pressure by donors, perhaps even with the reasonable response that “you have no proof and did no due diligence.”

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

That might be true, and might be a reason why you should have held off, but having gone with it, pulling it implies either something bad on her part (false claim) or on your part (capitulation). If it means something in the middle (“the claim may very likely be true or not, but it was wrong of us to publish this, since public accusations need some third party vetting before they are published”) then I think this needs to be said.

Thank you.

Zev Farber

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount