Would Guns Have Saved Jews From The Holocaust?

Each time the gun control debate comes up in discourse in the United States, someone invariably mentions that if the Jews were armed, the Holocaust would not have occurred. In February 2018, US Representative Don Young also made the same statement, which made countless Facebook memes pop up again, in addition to other social media fodder that uses this argument—some utilizing graphic photos of dead Jews. Those who oppose gun control and know little about the Holocaust continue to share the memes.

Previously, most articles speaking to this trope have limited their discussion to the German Weapons Act of 1938, which relaxed gun laws for German citizens and Nazi party members, while tightening them on Jews and other “undesirables.” Those who perpetuate the fallacy in defense of gun ownership state that this is somehow what caused the Holocaust to occur.

Historians note that there were only around 214,000 German Jews left in the country by 1938, and therefore disarming the Jewish population didn’t have a larger impact on the Nazi’s continued assault on surrounding countries. In fact, suggesting that 214,000 people with personal firearms could successfully defeat the Nazis and all who colluded with them is “mind-bending,” according to the CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt.

While those points are well taken, what is often ignored in the discussion are the civilians who refused to give up their firearms, and the lack of impact it created on the Nazi’s ability to kill 6 million Jews and millions of other so-called “enemies of the state.”

There is a pervasive narrative that the Jews went to their deaths like “sheep to slaughter.” This is not only not the case, but muddles up the complex reasons that Jews seemingly willingly went to their deaths at concentration camps.

A major point gun enthusiasts conveniently ignore when making the original argument, is that there were Jews who were armed during the Holocaust. The guns, obtained through illegal means or retained after surrender laws, did very little to stop the industrial death machine the Nazis had created.

There were cases when Jews rose up together in order to take their fate into their own hands, and in most cases, this did involve firearms. The famous Warsaw Ghetto Uprising occurred in the spring of 1943 as the Nazis began to close down the ghetto, shipping all of its inhabitants to Treblinka. The Nazis had planned to transport everyone from the ghetto to the camp in just three days, but it took almost a month, thanks to the network of underground Jewish fighters.

In the end, most of those who had chosen to fight perished at the hands of the Nazis, who used firebombs to burn them out of their underground hiding spots. While this uprising did delay the deportations to Treblinka, the Warsaw Ghetto was still emptied and most of the Jews within it perished.

One Sonderkommando (prisoners that emptied the gas chambers and put the bodies into ovens) group at Auschwitz staged a revolt after the incredibly bloody summer of 1944. This was thanks to the Nazis frantic bid to kill the remaining Hungarian Jews before the end of the war. The Sonderkommando had been working with Jewish women who were slave laborers in the nearby munitions factory. They began receiving small quantities of explosives from female prisoners. The group attacked on October 7, killing a handful of SS men and irreparably damaging Crematorium IV.

They did do damage to Crematorium IV, but it was never repaired partially because the war was coming to an end and the SS were well aware their days were numbered. If the revolt had happened earlier in Auschwitz’s grim history, it would have likely been repaired using slave labor almost immediately. The death factory continued work as usual in the remaining four crematoriums.

Stating that the Holocaust would not have happened if individual citizens were armed, as claimed by Young and Ben Carson, in addition to countless NRA supporters and meme-happy Facebook users, is at its best a distortion of facts. At its worst, it is an insult to not only those who survived, but those who sacrificed their own lives in order to attempt doomed rebellions in the hopes the world would not remember the victims of the Holocaust as meek and defenseless.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Would Guns Have Saved Jews From The Holocaust?

Tagged as:

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Would Guns Have Saved Jews From The Holocaust?

Thank you!

This article has been sent!