Jerusalem Offers Aid After Holocaust Survivors March On Israel’s Streets

No Funds To Go to ‘Refugees’

By Matthew Gutman

Published August 22, 2007, issue of August 24, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Jerusalem - After an acrimonious summer-long debate about Israel’s treatment of its Holocaust survivors, the Israeli government inked a controversial deal Sunday that will provide millions of dollars in financial aid to some survivors.

Holocaust survivors wore yellow Stars of David and striped pajamas earlier this month to protest the amount of aid they are receiving from the Israeli government
Holocaust survivors wore yellow Stars of David and striped pajamas earlier this month to protest the amount of aid they are receiving from the Israeli government

The plight of Israel’s Holocaust survivors, of whom there are estimated to be 260,000, has been on public display since the release of two reports earlier this year that pointed to high levels of poverty among their ranks. The government was slow to react, and a few weeks ago, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was confronted with a protest march in which survivors donned striped pajamas and yellow Stars of David.

The new package of benefits, agreed upon by Olmert’s Cabinet, will provide direct funds for people who lived through the death camps, labor camps and ghettos. But the legislation was criticized immediately by many survivor advocates, who said it leaves out tens of thousands of people who lived in Nazi-occupied countries but did not end up in the camps.

The legislation and the anger directed against Olmert are part of the latest, and probably last, stage in Israel’s long and ambivalent relationship with its survivors.

“Now, Olmert is being made to pay for the sins of governments past,” said Shira Hantman, a gerontologist and sociologist who is dean of Tel Hai Academic College in the Galilee.

This history was put into stark relief Monday, when the speaker of the Knesset, Dalia Itzik, issued an apology to Holocaust survivors on behalf of the Israeli government.

“We are here to rectify the situation so that we may be able to look into the survivors’ eyes and tell them on behalf of Israeli society, ‘We apologize,’” Itzik said in a special session of the Knesset.

From the earliest days of the Jewish state, the country has had an uneasy relationship with survivors of the Shoah. Israeli society in its infancy was focused on building a new archetype of a strong Jew, and the survivors’ discomfort brought about widespread discomfort.

Survivors themselves protested Israel’s acceptance of $750 million in German reparations in the early 1950s, dubbing it blood money. The money was paid directly to Israel rather than to survivors, leading to some of the recent bitterness.

Hantman said that in those years, survivors were concerned mostly with building a nation, rebuilding their families and fitting in. It wasn’t until after the trial and execution of Adolf Eichmann in 1961 that Israeli survivors broke their silence.

“There was an unspoken code that Auschwitz was left behind — a sort of ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy,” Hantman said.

While the German government has since begun to provide pensions for survivors, the Israeli government has given little in the way of extra benefits.

The government’s belated acknowledgement of the survivors’ situation follows a pair of reports giving the revelation that a third of Israel’s Holocaust survivors live well below the poverty line. The first report, published in April by the Holocaust Survivors’ Welfare Fund, found that as many as 80,000 survivors in Israel depend predominantly on government welfare.

The second report, published August 16 by Israel’s comptroller, Micha Lindenstrauss, found that 143,000 of the survivors are ineligible for state aid — the bulk of them so-called “Holocaust refugees,” needy survivors who fled Europe for the former Soviet Union.

The Lindenstrauss report skewered the government, saying, “The conduct of state authorities is characterized often times by unnecessary delays, postponements and foot-dragging.”

Israeli historian Tom Segev said that given Germany’s extensive reparations program for Holocaust survivors, “it could be that Germany treated the survivors better than the State of Israel did.”

The nadir came just before the comptroller’s report was published. Early this month, the government tabled an offer of a $20 monthly stipend to survivors, leading to such banner headlines as “How Dare They” in Israel’s newspapers. On August 5, thousands of survivors and their supporters marched in Jerusalem. Some wore the Star of David, others T-shirts emblazoned with the phrase “The Holocaust is still with us,” but most marched silently.

The deal brokered this week was more generous on some fronts than the Holocaust Survivors’ Welfare Fund had hoped for. It includes $275 monthly stipends given to some 7,000 survivors who have never received direct compensation from the German government.

Thousands of others will receive a one-time sum of about $700. Eventually, the government will transfer the funds to the Holocaust Survivors’ Welfare Fund, which will be tasked with distributing the aid.

But the only way the government was able to beef up stipends was by having some receive nothing at all. Those excluded from the current deal include roughly 85,000 “Holocaust refugees.”

The government has categorized this group as “the second circle”; those who lived under the rule of the Nazis or their allies are considered “the first circle.” While the state technically regards the former as survivors, it does not intend to compensate them as such, according to the Social Affairs Ministry.

Olmert told reporters that he feared he would create an “ethnic divide” if he subsidized European refugees but not the hundreds of thousands of Jews who fled persecution in Arab countries during the late ’40s and early ’50s.

Olmert’s decision was immediately controversial. Last Tuesday, Knesset member Ophir Pines-Paz noted that under the current rules, Anne Frank would not have received financial aid from the Israeli government if she had survived the Holocaust.

One of the deal’s negotiators, Uri Hanoch of the Holocaust Survivors’ Welfare Fund, said that the money will enable “thousands of survivors to live out their lives with some dignity.” He vowed, however, to fight on until all the survivors get their due.

Hanoch, who is a survivor of Dachau, said that the experience of Europeans during the Nazi era is unique and should be recognized as such.

“Half of my brethren, people who really need the help, will get nothing,” Hanoch said. “This is not right.”

Even survivors who will receive the aid greeted the news with some ambivalence.

“It’s too late,” said Elizabeth Dragowski, an 81-year-old who fled her native Lithuania and the doomed Kovno Ghetto to join Russian partisans in the forests.

Dragowski has buried her two husbands. Today, only her cats and her dog, Shahi, keep her company in a cramped Jerusalem studio brimming with rotting cat food. With the new money coming in, “maybe I can buy my friends better cat food,” she said, motioning to the cats curling up on her bed.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.