The Military in Flux


By Paul McLeary

Published December 11, 2007, issue of December 14, 2007.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts: The American Military in the Air, at Sea, and on the Ground

By Robert D. Kaplan
Random House, 448 pages, $27.95.

Soon after the attacks of September 11, 2001, Robert D. Kaplan, a travel writer who had long been attracted to the more volatile corners of the world, packed his rucksack and set out to become the real-time historian of an American military that most Americans knew little about: one that for the past decade had been thrust into the unfamiliar role of war fighter and diplomat, relief agency and police academy in some of the most dangerous addresses across the globe.

While he spent the requisite time inside the industrial war machine at work in Iraq and Afghanistan, Kaplan made the wise decision to focus his reporting on small squads of Special Forces soldiers and Marines, performing their little-noticed work far away from the battlefields of our two “hot” wars. These travels produced “Imperial Grunts: On the Ground With the American Military, From Mongolia to the Philippines to Iraq and Beyond” (originally published in 2005 by Random House), which chronicled how these units are training Third World military and police forces, setting up counterterrorism programs and providing humanitarian relief. For all its strengths as a snapshot of a military skillfully reinventing itself on the fly, the book — like all of Kaplan’s works that deal with the military — was marred by his often simplistic love affair with the foul-mouthed, God-fearing ground-pounder, whom Kaplan fetishized as a group of good-hearted Southerners and Midwesterners with a fine-tuned disdain for American civilians, most notably northeastern “elites,” which, helpfully, are Kaplan’s favorite targets as well. His latest book, “Hog Pilots, Blue Water Grunts: The American Military in the Air, at Sea, and on the Ground,” is a continuation of these embedded military snapshots, and as such picks up on the same themes elaborated in “Imperial Grunts.” But, as the subtitle suggests, Kaplan has moved on to sea and air operations, mostly in the Pacific theater, far from the mud huts of the Horn of Africa and South America.

If “Imperial Grunts” presaged the wider American public’s acceptance of counterinsurgency as a model for 21st-century warfare, “Hog Pilots” comes at a time when the use of civilian contractors in military operations has finally got the public’s attention, and Kaplan again manages to be in step with the news. We’re introduced to Dan, an American civilian living in Thailand who handles the logistics for American Air Force pilots in Thailand for joint-training missions with the Royal Thai Air Force. Kaplan is thrilled at the arraignment, since through the use of this one contractor, “a cooperative security location that belonged to the host country, with no permanent American troops, but in the event of a crisis could be used by American troops” has been established. He also spends time on the privatization of military transport in the Pacific, where the Marine Corps has contracted with private companies to keep groups of pre-positioned ships in the region ready to transport Marine battalions at a moment’s notice. This “might even be the only practical way forward in an age of war when individual expertise and initiative often mattered more than sheer manpower numbers.”

This is the kind of thing that gets Kaplan particularly excited: He trumpets any situation in which the American military can project power globally while maintaining a small footprint. Indeed, remaining nimble while retaining the ability to respond in force is the holy grail that generals have been chasing for centuries. In his excitement, however, Kaplan ignores any problems that might arise from such an arrangement, as we’ve seen recently in Iraq with both Blackwater and the millions — and possibly billions — in graft that are starting to come to light among private contractors there.

For everything that Kaplan gets right, the specter of his literary vices and overt biases haunt every page, and reviewers have generally had a field day picking them apart. Tom Bissell, in a devastating critique of Kaplan in the Virginia Quarterly Review, called him “an incompetent thinker and a miserable writer,” and in an equally stunning rebuke, military strategist Thomas P.M. Barnett called a Kaplan essay about naval power in the Pacific and the likelihood of war with China (the piece later became part of “Hog Pilots”) “a stunningly unbalanced piece of work” that is “U.S. Navy and Pacific Command propaganda at its best.”

Indeed, while he does offer the occasional criticism, Kaplan seems too much in thrall to his subjects to provide any real analysis other than to report how well they’re doing their jobs. This isn’t to say he isn’t critical of the military when the need arises, but his criticisms often come after page upon page of wide-eyed wonderment over the military’s prowess. That said, “Imperial Grunts” and “Hog Pilots” are invaluable for providing a snapshot of the American military at a time of wrenching transition, as long as you accept that you’re getting the cheerleader’s-eye view. For an idea of how much of his own biases Kaplan injects into his books about the military, try flipping though Washington Post reporter Dana Priest’s excellent 2003 book, “The Mission: Waging War and Keeping Peace With America’s Military” (W. W. Norton & Company), which covers essentially the same ground, and which partially overlaps with the time Kaplan was writing his own two books. While “The Mission” lives within the world of journalistic objectivity and is written as a dispassionate, by-the-numbers report on the state of the American military struggling to define itself after the Cold War, Kaplan goes in the totally opposite direction, acting as the unabashed champion of the selfless ground-pounder. This makes for a much better read, to be sure, but it also leads to a sloppiness for which Kaplan has taken some much-deserved heat.

This might sound like a small thing, but Kaplan’s unrelenting praise for his subjects stands in the way of a clear view of the pluses and minuses of contemporary military policy. This, plus his oft-stated disdain for the American “elite” (to which Kaplan, with his multiple book contracts, regular gig writing at the Atlantic Monthly and another lecturing at the United States Naval Academy, most assuredly belongs), renders many of his utterances on this score either self-loathing or completely tone-deaf. For example, he claims that “no matter how much the combat arms community of the American military with its warrior ethos believed in its worldwide mission, the American governing class… had less stomach for it.” This might make sense if there had not been sufficient documentation that the civilians at the White House, the Pentagon and in Congress pushed for war in Iraq — and the continuation of that war — against most expert military advice. But this is classic Kaplan, seeing only a schism between the brave warrior class and the mewling elites who can’t be trusted with the bloody work of empire. It’s a schism that exists primarily in Kaplan’s mind, or at least one he sometimes gets backward.

That said, while Kaplan is an invaluable resource as long as he continues shouldering his rucksack and heading out into the world with the military, his utility quickly diminishes when he moves away from chronicling the military and tries to become its trench-weary theorist.

Paul McLeary writes for the Columbia Journalism Review and for Defense Technology International magazine.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here:
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.