The Talmud on Watching TV

Nu & Improved

By Lenore Skenazy

Published September 07, 2010, issue of September 17, 2010.
  • Print
  • Share Share

It’s almost as if the Talmud writers understood what would happen if we watched too much TV. They knew it would drive us wild with worry. From the morning shows to the local news at night, all we hear about is danger, danger, danger — right? Salmonella on the cutting board! BPA in baby bottles! Pedophiles on the Internet, and perverts at the park! “Is there a killer lurking in your kitchen cabinet? Details at 11!”

(By the way, wouldn’t you want to know before 11 if something in your kitchen cabinet were about to kill you?) Anyway, here’s what the Talmud has to say about that — about all the dangers surrounding us:

“They are more numerous than us,” the ancient text says. “They stand about us like a ditch around a mound.” Talmudist Rav Huna said: “Each one of us has a thousand to his left and 10,000 to his right.” And while you do have to substitute the word “dangers” for “demons,” here’s the Talmud’s clincher: “If the eye would be granted permission to see, no creature would be able to stand in the face of the demons.”


In other words, if our eyes were opened to all the heaps of horrors that surround us, we’d be paralyzed with fear.

Which seems to be exactly what is happening the second we turn on the TV. (No wonder we call those sages sages.)

While the Talmud was talking about actual evil forces swirling around us, its authors understood that being aware of all of them is not necessarily a blessing. In fact, it’s a curse. And yet, that is exactly what the media has taken as its mission: to inform us about every last little thing that could ever possibly hurt us, no matter how remote the chances.

“Just about anything that’s common in everyday life can be turned into a scary, terrifying message,” said Benjamin Radford, an editor at the bimonthly magazine The Skeptical Inquirer and author of “Media Mythmakers: How Journalists, Activists, and Advertisers Mislead Us” (Prometheus Books, 2003). As such, he pays a lot of attention to what he calls the “news ooze” on TV, and to what constitutes a typical news story.

“It’s remarkable how it can be anything, from, ‘Your children’s bus driver may be a pedophile!’ to, ‘Sunscreen will kill you!’ to, ‘Too much aspirin will kill you!’ to, ‘Not enough aspirin will kill you!’ to, ‘Your drinking water will kill you,’” he said. And the ironic part is, there’s usually an element of truth to every one of these claims. Yes, drinking water can kill you if you drink too much of it — gallons and gallons in a single sitting. Of course, death by dilution is “very, very rare,” Radford said. “But the news isn’t necessarily there to correctly and accurately inform people. It’s trying to get ratings.”

Time and again, the easiest ratings booster is to tell people about demons. Er… danger!

One morning I was watching TV, and the ad kept coming on for Dr. Oz’s topic of the day: “Is your makeup dangerous?” The clips — and horrified faces of Oz’s guests — indicated that it probably is. So I turned off the TV and clicked on my computer. The main story on Yahoo’s home page? “5 Serious Dangers at the Office.” Aieeeee! When it is dangerous to put on some lipstick and go sit in a chair, you can bet pretty much nothing is safe.

And considering that many of us come from the group that inspired this, my favorite joke — “Did you hear about the Jewish telegram? ‘Start worrying. Details to follow.’” — we are hardly immune from fear. In fact, some of us, me, are chronic worriers. What can we do to tone down the demons and enjoy life? Figure that whenever you hear some incredibly surprising warning, like “Rubber bands cause cancer” (I’m making that up!), it’s probably wrong, says David Freedman, author of the new book “Wrong: Why Experts Keep Failing Us — And How To Know When Not To Trust Them” (Little, Brown and Company).

The same thing that makes a story great news fodder — “It’s shocking! Scary! A complete surprise!”— is usually the same reason it’s not likely to hold up, Freedman says. Either the study was biased or small, or it’s being misinterpreted.

Add to this the fact that when we hear about something that increases our odds of this or that terrible fate, it’s usually way out of context. “Typically, when someone is warning about something and it’s a real danger — for example, it [creates] a real increase in cancer risk — you’re probably talking about raising your risk of a particular type of cancer from maybe 1% to 1.25%,” said Freedman. So while the news trumpets “A 25% increase in risk!” what it doesn’t explain is that you had a teeny-tiny chance of getting X before, and now you still have a teeny-tiny chance of getting it.

Long story short? The Talmud got it right: As Rav Huna said, “Turn off the TV and chillax” (just not in those exact words).

Lenore Skenazy is the founder of and author of “Free-Range Kids: How To Raise Safe, Self-Reliant Children (Without Going Nuts With Worry)” (Jossey-Bass, 2009).

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  •'s Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.