John Lennon and the Jews

Why Being Jewish Means Not Loving Humanity

Best Buddies: John Lennon stands with Leon Wildes, the lawyer who helped him win the right to stay in the U.S.
Best Buddies: John Lennon stands with Leon Wildes, the lawyer who helped him win the right to stay in the U.S.

By Hillel Halkin

Published August 09, 2011, issue of August 19, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

John Lennon & the Jews: A Philosophical Rampage
By Ze’ev Maghen
CreateSpace, 296 pages, $12.50

As a rule, I wouldn’t agree to review a book with “John Lennon” in its title. I also wouldn’t review a self-published book. (Although publishing one’s own work is no crime, it does tend to indicate that no one else has thought as highly of it as its author has.) And I certainly wouldn’t review a book that came to me with the handwritten dedication, “To Hillel, who, more than anyone, is guilty of inspiring this screed.” Full disclosure, full shmishclosure — there’s a limit, even if I were innocent of the charges.

Moreover, I may not be, since Ze’ev Maghen, today a professor of Arabic literature and Islamic history at Bar-Ilan University in Israel, claims to have been influenced, as a young man growing up in Philadelphia, by my “Letters to an American Jewish Friend,” written in 1976. I know because he once told me so. That was about 10 years ago, when an earlier version of “John Lennon and the Jews” first appeared as a lengthy essay in the journal Azure.

Why, then, did I accept the Forward’s invitation to review this “screed,” purporting to be published by “Bottom Books” of “16245 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y.”? Solely in order to get you to read it. And you should especially read it if you are Jewish and 1) young; 2) think being Jewish is a bore; 3) Don’t, but can’t explain why it isn’t; 4) believe that social justice everywhere is a Jewish cause; 5) believe that saving the rain forests is a Jewish cause; 6) pride yourself on caring equally about Israelis and Palestinians; 7) deplore Israel for its narrow nationalism; 8) can’t imagine living there; 9) are troubled by the tribal aspects of Jewish identity; 10) are put off by the irrationality of many of the commandments of Judaism; 11) practice Buddhist or Hindu meditation; 12) count Mahatma Gandhi among your heroes; 13) regard the God of your fathers as a character in a children’s story.

If you fall into, or close to, any of these categories, Ze’ev Maghen has written “John Lennon & the Jews” for you. Or rather, he has written it against you, since you’ll argue with him on every page that doesn’t leave you laughing or spluttering too hard to fight back. There are likely, however, to be many such pages, because this is a very funny and utterly outrageous book. Not for nothing is it subtitled “A Philosophical Rampage.” It’s manically exuberant, intellectually reckless and never afraid to sound zany (no wonder it couldn’t find a publisher), as a result of which it’s deadly serious and perfectly sane.

Maghen’s starting point is that most common yet competed-for of emotions, human love. Not love with a capital “L” — not love as an abstraction, or a dreamy state of rapture, or an idea or principal or attitude toward the universe and its inhabitants — but love as it is actually experienced by nearly all of us, which is, as something we feel for a relatively small number of particular people in our lives. Real love, as Maghen rightly observes, is by nature discriminatory (the word he uses is “preferential”), since loving everyone is the same as loving no one.

The greatest lovers of humanity — the Gandhis, the Tolstoys, the Schweitzers, the Mother Teresas — have not infrequently been brutal in their personal relationships. To love truly is always to love the few and not the many, to feel more responsible for some than for others, to be willing to risk one’s life for this person and not for that one. This makes love unfair, which is why we value it so much. Woe to the child whose father, seeing it and a stranger’s child in danger, hesitates which to rescue first, because he loves all children.

The psychological and emotional reality of preferential love — love that creates privileged relationships among people, in groups, in societies, between (dare one think it? Jews always have) God and man — is the building block from which Maghen constructs a sustained argument for Jewishness, Judaism, Zionism and Israel, while intrepidly crashing into, if not quite managing to overturn, some very big apple carts, including ancient Greek philosophy, Christianity, Eastern religions and modern science. And you can add to these his teenage idol, John Lennon, the words to whose song “Imagine” (“Imagine there’s no countries / It isn’t hard to do / Nothing to kill or die for / And no religion too /… I hope someday you’ll join us / And the world will live as one”) Maghen now understands to be expressing the seductive but ultimately totalitarian wish to homogenize us all in one big human milkshake.

Were he writing only on behalf of Jewish particularism, Maghen would, in the end, be obnoxious. Instead, his argument is for all particularisms, though it is at the same time keenly aware of the moral dilemmas with which ways of life whose values clash with our own can present us. It’s a celebration of human difference over human sameness, of variety against uniformity, of genuine multiculturalism as opposed to that sham version of it that grants everyone the right to be unique except ourselves. “John Lennon and the Jews” is, by implication, also a plea for Zoroastrians, Quechua speakers, New Guinea tribesmen and quirky individualists of every stripe and color. It is on the side of “All things counter, original, spare, strange,” as Gerard Manley Hopkins put it in one of his loveliest poems.

I suspect that Maghen would have written every word of this splendid book even if he had never read “Letters to an American Jewish Friend.” Still, I’m honored if I had anything to do with it.

And, oh, for you non-New Yorkers: Don’t bother writing to 16245 Park Avenue, because there’s no such address. “John Lennon and the Jews” is available, so I’m told, from Amazon.

Hillel Halkin is the author of, most recently, “Yehuda Halevi” (Nextbook/Schocken, 2010).

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.