Le Pen Gains Little Traction on U.S. Trip

Right-Winger Rises in Polls as She Channels Herman Cain

Madame No Name: Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front party hasn’t received much attention on her trip to the U.S.
getty images
Madame No Name: Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front party hasn’t received much attention on her trip to the U.S.

By Robert Zaretsky

Published November 06, 2011.
  • Print
  • Share Share

She came, she saw, and she was ignored.

Marine Le Pen, the leader of France’s National Front has not conquered America as she reaches the end of her five-day official trip. In fact, she has scarcely raised a ripple on the surface of the American media. The New York Times has ignored Le Pen’s whirlwind tour, while The Washington Post could not muster its own staff to cover the event. With the exception of The Huffington Post, Internet sites have scarcely been more attentive to the visit for a politician who represents a far-right wing party, yet nevertheless has a credible chance at becoming France’s next president.



The silence surrounding Le Pen’s visit to the U.S. raises a few questions. For literary types, there is the surreal aspect to this official tour: perhaps only André Breton could do justice to Le Pen’s “official” meeting at the UN yesterday attended by only five representatives (including those of Uruguay, Armenia and Tobago). Political satirists might debate how Coluche would have staged the effort by Le Pen’s handlers to bar a posse of French journalists from entering the United States Congress? Lovers of conspiracy theories will likely dwell on Le Pen’s breakfast meeting with Richard Hines. When not serving as a Washington lobbyist for bloody-minded dictators, Hines edited a magazine, Southern Partisan, devoted to the “Lost Cause” of the American Confederacy (and which bears a stark resemblance to the violent partisans of “L’Algérie française”).

And what about the philosophically-inclined? They might ask if a French politician falls on her face in America and no one hears it, does she make a sound? But such a question is of course irrelevant. Le Pen did not come to conquer America; she instead came to conquer France. Or, at least, convince enough undecided French voters in 2012 that she has enough international credibility in order to sign a five-year lease on the Elysée.

This is a question the French, of course, will decide on their own. It may well be that Le Pen will benefit from her short meeting on Thursday with Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations (despite the subsequent announcement from the office that the meeting was based on a “misunderstanding.”) Yet no matter how brief or misrepresented this meeting was, it marks a milestone in Marine Le Pen’s effort to distance “her” FN from the anti-Semitic movement she inherited from her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen.

But what most strikes an American observer is how closely Le Pen’s campaign and politics resemble those of Herman Cain. Sure, one is black and the other white, one is a guy the other a gal, one is American and the other French, but if we dig a bit deeper they are remarkably similar.

Both Le Pen and Cain boast brutal policies in regard to the issue of illegal immigrants whether they speak Spanish or Arabic. Just as Le Pen’s makes political hay with her denunciations of the Muslim “occupation” of France, Cain plays the immigrant card as well. When Cain was condemned for the “insensitivity” of his remarks concerning an electric fence along the border with Mexico, he replied the immigrants were insensitive by entering our country (and, I guess, insisting on cleaning our toilets, picking our fruit and collecting our garbage). Similarly, Le Pen demands that North African migrants trying to land on European shores should be “pushed back into the sea.”

Both Le Pen and Cain denounce the power of national and supranational financial institutions, and both offer simplistic and disastrous solutions to the economic malaise of their respective countries. Le Pen’s “retour au franc” is, in reality, little different from Cain’s 9/9/9 which proposes to scrap the existing tax code and replace it with a 9% personal income tax, a 9% business tax and a 9% sales tax. Just as Cain’s proposal horrifies even conservative economists like Bruce Bartlett, who served as George W. Bush’s economic advisor, Le Pen’s insistence that France retire from the euro is condemned as catastrophic by economists across the political spectrum.

And herein lies the most remarkable parallel between Le Pen and Cain. No matter how outrageous or improbable their proposals, no matter how slapstick and bizarre their campaigns, both presidential candidates continue to rise in the polls. Le Pen has reached 19% of popular support in the latest Ipsos poll in France. In Cain’s case, his campaign has had even more success raising money, and Cain has won even more popular support, in the wake of the revelation that two women who worked under him in the 1990s accused him of sexual harassment.

Why? In part, both Le Pen and Cain exploit the distaste and frustration with traditional politics felt by a growing number of American and French citizens. These same supporters, faced by overwhelmingly complex problems, convinced that their countries are somehow slipping away from them, find solace in the simple nostrums offered by these ostensibly anti-establishment figures. And, of course, every attempt by politicians and the “official” media to dissect the economic, political and social prescriptions offered by Le Pen and Cain only comforts the popular belief that these candidates do have the right answers.

In the face of this perverse logic that fuels these “protest” candidacies in both of our countries, it may be that our only response is Samuel Beckett’s: “I can’t go on. I will go on.”

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.