The Inquisition Is Now (and Forever)

Author Sees Torquemada Under Every Stone of History

Tortured Account: Cullen Murphy’s new book tries too hard to trace unconnected (nasty) events to the (also nasty) Inquisition.
getty images
Tortured Account: Cullen Murphy’s new book tries too hard to trace unconnected (nasty) events to the (also nasty) Inquisition.

By Ilan Stavans

Published March 20, 2012, issue of March 23, 2012.
  • Print
  • Share Share

God’s Jury: The Inquisition and the Making of the Modern World
By Cullen Murphy
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 320 pages, $27

There is something preposterous about Cullen Murphy’s journey through the history of the Inquisition. He analyzes it as if it were the root of all institutional evil in the modern world. Really.

For years the managing editor of The Atlantic Monthly, and currently editor-at-large of Vanity Fair, Murphy writes as an overzealous journalist eager to prove to the naive reader that everything around us is connected. And while he has an enviable freedom that refuses to be imprisoned by strict academic disciplines, he comes across as a glutton for connections who is unable to differentiate even the most essential of flavors.

Murphy begins his quest at the Vatican, in the archives of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. He looks into why, in 1231, the Church developed a unit to hunt for heretics among the Cathars of southern France. This entity then mutated into a sophisticated machine to persecute other perceived threats and the Inquisition, as we know it, resulted. Murphy explores its vicissitudes elsewhere in Europe (England, Italy, etc.) where its impact was dependent on its context. While the exact number affected remains elusive, its celebrity victims included Joan of Arc, Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno. Some were sacrificed in public performances called autos-da-fe, others merely censored.

Not surprising, Murphy’s inquiry places special attention on Spain, where the Inquisition acquired an utterly fearful identity. The ideals of convivencia, the cohabitation of Jews, Christians and Muslims, were discarded as Catholicism consolidated power and members of other faiths were simply forced to convert. Some of those conversions appeared to have been performed only superficially, without full conviction, allowing for the emergence of a new class, the New Christians, whose role in the development of the modern world, contemporary historians of the Enlightenment argue, is unquestionable.

An ongoing debate among scholars about who, precisely, was the target of inquisitorial wrath continues to offer alternative answers. Not the Jews, for although they were seen as unappealing, their presence was easily manageable, since their identity was common knowledge. Nor the converts, since conversion was honestly performed by thousands with no persistent dual affiliation. No, it was the crypto-Jews within the organization’s purview whose disloyalty generated the most discomfort. They, along with other deviants, were persecuted and, on occasion, burned at the stake in autos-da-fe.

Murphy visits the different historical theories about El Santo Oficio, especially those by Benzion Netanyahu, the current Israeli prime minister’s professor father. He ponders the work of Henry Charles Lea, Carlo Ginzburg, Henry Kamen and others. Unfortunately, he leaves out Yirmiyahu Yovel, whose book “The Other Within” is a lucid analysis of the split identity of conversos, those Jews who converted to Christianity to prevent persecution or expulsion. And he contemplates the extremities of the Spanish Empire across the Atlantic, pondering the role of the Inquisition in Mexico, where “defectors” like Luis de Carvajal the Younger sought refuge and reawakened to their Jewish faith, only to be annihilated for such courage.

I wish he had been more thorough recounting the story of the victims of the Catholic Church in the Hispanic world. He would have come across 6th-century Spanish poet Fray Luis de León, author of, among other things, astonishing commentaries on the Song of Songs and the Book of Job. And he would have read 17th-century Mexican nun Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, arguably the best ever female versifier of the Spanish language, responsible for the poem “First Dream,” which is structured as the journey of the human soul across “Nature” to understand itself. These are but two of the dozens, not to say hundreds, of prominent targets of the Inquisition, whose ordeal was not as Hollywood-like as the others Murphy recounts. The fist that descended on them was a bit more subtle but not less merciful.

This oversight shows that Murphy is too impatient for his own good and that nuance isn’t his forte. The same over-the-top “Sum it all up, Champ!” strategy was present in his previous book, “Are We Rome?” where, adopting an Edward Gibbon-like kaleidoscopic view, he compared the fall of the Roman Empire to the demise of America as the world’s superpower. He sees the shadow of the Inquisition everywhere in the mechanisms of suppression, surveillance and torture used under Stalin’s government. The Argentine military junta employed the same method. The list goes on from here: North Korea, J. Edgar Hoover, Guantánamo…. You got it: Torquemada isn’t dead yet and won’t be anytime soon.

Murphy’s encyclopedic dance makes room for references to Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible,” Arthur Koestler’s “Darkness at Noon,” Graham Greene’s “The Power and the Glory,” and Ray Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451.” He adduces these volumes to show the tentacles of the Spanish Inquisition in the 20th century. But do we need to root all forms of institutional bigotry, including censorship, in the Holy Office? Wherever there’s a martyr of state persecution, in his view, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has its tentacles. Even if religion has been replaced by secularism in the modern world, Murphy still hammers his point: The type of intolerance we have today, rooted in non-religious principles, is a brainchild of the Spanish monastic censors of centuries past.

So for those interested in skin-deep knowledge of the kind that depends on manipulative insights, “God’s Jury” will be amusing. The rest of us will be weeded out. Murphy is content with arranging information, not with reaching calibrated knowledge. Indeed, numerous pages in his book read as an extended, personalized Wikipedia entry. A graduate of Amherst College, where he is a trustee (and where I am a tenured professor), he distills the passion of a liberal arts enthusiast who believes the world is at his fingertips. There are engaging passages in the book on the “Index of Forbidden Books,” and about the Nazi past of Pope Benedict XVI, formerly Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. And as a Virgil, Murphy can be companionable. His intellectual curiosity, however, is often undermined by his need to rush to the next theme.

All this to say that he isn’t a thinker but a connector. The Holy Office is no more the root of all institutional evil than Noah’s Ark is the root of all Darwinism. The world, happily, is more complex.

Ilan Stavans is the Lewis-Sebring professor of Latin American and Latino culture at Amherst College. His latest book is “Return to Centro Histórico: A Mexican Jew Looks for His Roots” (Rutgers University Press).


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Novelist Sayed Kashua finds it hard to write about the heartbreak of Gaza from the plush confines of Debra Winger's Manhattan pad. Tough to argue with that, whichever side of the conflict you are on.
  • "I’ve never bought illegal drugs, but I imagine a small-time drug deal to feel a bit like buying hummus underground in Brooklyn."
  • We try to show things that get less exposed to the public here. We don’t look to document things that are nice or that people would like. We don’t try to show this place as a beautiful place.”
  • A new Gallup poll shows that only 25% of Americans under 35 support the war in #Gaza. Does this statistic worry you?
  • “You will stomp us into the dirt,” is how her mother responded to Anya Ulinich’s new tragicomic graphic novel. Paul Berger has a more open view of ‘Lena Finkle’s Magic Barrel." What do you think?
  • PHOTOS: Hundreds of protesters marched through lower Manhattan yesterday demanding an end to American support for Israel’s operation in #Gaza.
  • Does #Hamas have to lose for there to be peace? Read the latest analysis by J.J. Goldberg.
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.