How the Other Half of America Still Lives

Sasha Abramsky Follows in Michael Harrington's Footsteps

The Way Things Were (and Are): In Michael Harrington’s day, the official poverty rate was 19%. In September of this year, it was 15%.
William Lovelace/Getty Images
The Way Things Were (and Are): In Michael Harrington’s day, the official poverty rate was 19%. In September of this year, it was 15%.

By Gordon Haber

Published December 18, 2013, issue of December 20, 2013.
  • Print
  • Share Share
  • Single Page

(page 2 of 2)

Abramsky has the leftie bonafides for the project. Raised in England, he learned about socialist politics from his grandfather Chimen Abramsky, an estimable historian and Jewish antiquities expert. The younger Abramsky has contributed to The Nation, Mother Jones, and The American Prospect; currently he is a fellow at Demos, a liberal think tank.

Abramsky spent much of 2011 traveling the nation, chronicling “the faces and voices of economic hardship in America.” The result is “The American Way of Poverty: How the Other Half Still Lives.”

It is depressing to note the similarities to Harrington’s day. Poverty is still entrenched in places like Appalachia and Mississippi. African-Americans are still more vulnerable to economic downturns than whites. Poor people are still more likely to get sick and less likely to get a decent education.

The differences are depressing as well — most notably the rise of the working poor. As wages fall and the cost of health care rises, it has become much harder for millions of employed Americans to get by. Recent disasters, like Hurricane Katrina and the housing market crash, have worsened their plight.

Abramsky provides striking individual pictures from his travels. Two disturbing examples come from Hawaii’s Big Island, where families build hovels on the edge of the rainforest. One couple lives with their 3-year-old son “in a home without a toilet, without running water, without electricity.” Both parents have jobs at a country club.

Nearby, an Air Force veteran and his wife are supporting their daughter and son-in-law and their four children on Social Security checks and food stamps. At the end of the month, when money gets tight, the family faces the common dilemma of “heat or eat” — whether to buy gas for the generator or food for the family.

Another disturbing story comes out of California’s Central Valley. When Megan Roberts’ husband, a truck mechanic, got a $1-an-hour raise, the family was no longer eligible for Medicare. Roberts suffered a ruptured appendix, which put the family almost $100,000 in debt. The Roberts were forced to declare bankruptcy. Then, at the age of 31, Megan was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. By this time the family had health care, and the treatment was successful. But even with coverage, the Roberts were again left with six figures of debt.

“The American Way of Poverty” is a sobering look at the deepening economic insecurity faced by some fifty million of Americans. But Abramsky has an even more ambitious goal: to present “a roadmap to change, a blueprint for a new War on Poverty.”

His ideas are bold. He wants an Educational Opportunity Fund (EOF) to grant $5000 “to every child born in the United States” so that they could eventually graduate college without debt. He wants a “huge public works trust fund” that would provide useful jobs, like fixing bridges, during times of high unemployment. He wants the federal government to provide gas stamps, raise the minimum wage and guarantee a minimum income — perhaps $7000 per year for every man, woman and child in America.

Of course, we would pay for all these programs with higher taxes. Abramsky would increase capital gains taxes, inheritance taxes and income taxes for the upper brackets. The EOF and the public works would be funded by a small hike in payroll taxes. An additional $150 billion could be raised by taxing all financial trades, “from stocks to bonds, from currency trades to credit default initiatives.”

Certainly if we’re going to do anything about poverty, we must raise taxes. But Abramsky evinces the common misconception that if we just tax and spend enough, everything will be fine. There’s little discussion of the role that tax incentives might play in reducing poverty — say, for companies that raise wages or expand to areas of low unemployment.

Abramsky seems confused by the difference between government spending and disposable income. He complains about the “fripperies,” like plastic surgery and pets that Americans spend their money on, as if that cash would otherwise be funneled to the poor. And by the way, according to the Small Business Administration, companies that employ fewer than 20 people — like pet stores and plastic surgery practices — employ nearly 20 percent of American workers.

These missteps blunt the rhetorical force of “The American Way of Poverty.” And they will give conservatives a handy excuse to ignore its message. I suspect that the tepid left will ignore it as well, being that these days the most defining characteristic of liberals is that they hate conservatives, and not, say, their abiding concern for the underclass. All this is a shame, because Abramsky’s larger point is so important: Americans are suffering, and we’re not doing much about it.

Gordon Haber is, most recently, the author of the Amazon Kindle Single ‘Adjunctivitis.’

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Move over Dr. Ruth — there’s a (not-so) new sassy Jewish sex-therapist in town. Her name is Shirley Zussman — and just turned 100 years old.
  • From kosher wine to Ecstasy, presenting some of our best bootlegs:
  • Sara Kramer is not the first New Yorker to feel the alluring pull of the West Coast — but she might be the first heading there with Turkish Urfa pepper and za’atar in her suitcase.
  • About 1 in 40 American Jews will get pancreatic cancer (Ruth Bader Ginsberg is one of the few survivors).
  • At which grade level should classroom discussions include topics like the death of civilians kidnapping of young Israelis and sirens warning of incoming rockets?
  • Wanted: Met Council CEO.
  • “Look, on the one hand, I understand him,” says Rivka Ben-Pazi, a niece of Elchanan Hameiri, the boy that Henk Zanoli saved. “He had a family tragedy.” But on the other hand, she said, “I think he was wrong.” What do you think?
  • How about a side of Hitler with your spaghetti?
  • Why "Be fruitful and multiply" isn't as simple as it seems:
  • William Schabas may be the least of Israel's problems.
  • You've heard of the #IceBucketChallenge, but Forward publisher Sam Norich has something better: a #SoupBucketChallenge (complete with matzo balls!) Jon Stewart, Sarah Silverman & David Remnick, you have 24 hours!
  • Did Hamas just take credit for kidnapping the three Israeli teens?
  • "We know what it means to be in the headlines. We know what it feels like when the world sits idly by and watches the news from the luxury of their living room couches. We know the pain of silence. We know the agony of inaction."
  • When YA romance becomes "Hasidsploitation":
  • "I am wrapping up the summer with a beach vacation with my non-Jewish in-laws. They’re good people and real leftists who try to live the values they preach. This was a quality I admired, until the latest war in Gaza. Now they are adamant that American Jews need to take more responsibility for the deaths in Gaza. They are educated people who understand the political complexity, but I don’t think they get the emotional complexity of being an American Jew who is capable of criticizing Israel but still feels a deep connection to it. How can I get this across to them?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.