E.U. Slams Israel, But Summit Finds Common Ground

By Marc Perelman

Published December 02, 2005, issue of December 02, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Fresh on the heels of its first ever mandate to station monitors at the border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, the European Union is trying to reassert itself into the Israeli-Palestinian process.

So far, the push is producing mixed results.

First the E.U. came under fire from Israel last week over a leaked internal report criticizing Israel’s policies in East Jerusalem. Then, later in the week, E.U. leaders were forced to go to the wire to salvage a summit meeting with Mediterranean countries in Barcelona marked by Israeli-Arab wrangling and the absence of heads of states from the Middle East.

The flaps come just weeks after U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice brokered a deal between Israeli and Palestinian officials that calls for E.U. forces to monitor the Rafah border crossing in coordination with Israel. This is the first time that the E.U. will have “boots on the ground” as a neutral third party in territories. But Israeli officials, who had expressed reluctance at the new European role, were quick to blast the E.U. after a New York Times report detailed E.U. criticism of Israel’s policies in East Jerusalem.

According to the Times, the E.U.’s diplomatic representatives in East Jerusalem and Ramallah claimed in a draft report prepared for E.U. foreign ministers that Israel’s actions in East Jerusalem “are reducing the possibility of reaching a final-status agreement on Jerusalem that any Palestinian could accept.” In its report, the E.U. representatives urged European leaders to take more aggressive steps to challenge Israeli policies in East Jerusalem.

European officials stressed that the report was not final and that it merely was aimed at providing guidance to top decision-makers.

In Barcelona, the prestige of the “Euro-Mediterranean” summit was tarnished by the absence of the majority of Middle Eastern leaders. While most E.U. heads of state attended, the only top Middle Eastern leaders to make the trip were Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Lower-ranking officials represented other Middle Eastern nations. Israel sent its finance minister, Ehud Olmert.

Divisions over the Middle East peace process forced European leaders to drop a formal “common vision” statement on revamping relations with their southern neighbors by linking aid more directly to democratic, economic and political reforms.

Israel objected to part of the draft summary referring to the “road map” and in particular to a paragraph linking the plan — sponsored by the E.U., the United Nations, the United States and Russia — to the 2002 declaration of the Arab League summit that was based on a Saudi peace plan. Jerusalem only agreed to a general mention of the road map and support for a two-state solution.

Israel also scored a diplomatic victory when E.U. leaders, desperate to produce a concrete achievement, rammed through an anti-terrorism “code of conduct” by strongarming Arab countries during feverish and protracted negotiations. In an indication of the climate at the summit, Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Zapatero and a senior aide were caught on a microphone discussing the urgent need to come up with a deal before the end of the gathering.

In the end, the 35 countries endorsed a code of conduct that denounces terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. Officials were quick to paint the text as a model for long-stalled negotiations at the U.N. to define terrorism and enact a dozen conventions on terrorism.

The E.U. and Israel resisted an Arab push to effectively exempt attacks by those “under foreign occupation” from the definition of terrorism, a term used by Arab nations at the U.N. to refer to Israeli rule in the Palestinian territories that also could be applied by some nations to America’s presence in Iraq.

The code states that “terrorist attacks cannot be justified or legitimized by any cause or grievance.”

British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the summit’s host, hailed the agreement as “a very significant step forward.”

“I think this is very important both for the European countries, but also for our other colleagues around the table,” Blair said during a press conference. “It’s as strong a statement as you can possibly have on the unified determination to fight terrorism in all its forms.”

Speaking in Berlin, E.U. Justice Commissioner Franco Frattini said the document could trigger a breakthrough in U.N. efforts to agree on a definition of terrorism and a code of conduct for governments worldwide.

Among other things, the code requires the E.U., Israel and its neighbors to attempt to “prevent terrorists accessing money and weapons, to disrupt their plans and disrupt their networks and to bring them to justice by strengthening international cooperation.”

Find us on Facebook!
  • At which grade level should classroom discussions include topics like the death of civilians kidnapping of young Israelis and sirens warning of incoming rockets?
  • Wanted: Met Council CEO.
  • “Look, on the one hand, I understand him,” says Rivka Ben-Pazi, a niece of Elchanan Hameiri, the boy that Henk Zanoli saved. “He had a family tragedy.” But on the other hand, she said, “I think he was wrong.” What do you think?
  • How about a side of Hitler with your spaghetti?
  • Why "Be fruitful and multiply" isn't as simple as it seems:
  • William Schabas may be the least of Israel's problems.
  • You've heard of the #IceBucketChallenge, but Forward publisher Sam Norich has something better: a #SoupBucketChallenge (complete with matzo balls!) Jon Stewart, Sarah Silverman & David Remnick, you have 24 hours!
  • Did Hamas just take credit for kidnapping the three Israeli teens?
  • "We know what it means to be in the headlines. We know what it feels like when the world sits idly by and watches the news from the luxury of their living room couches. We know the pain of silence. We know the agony of inaction."
  • When YA romance becomes "Hasidsploitation":
  • "I am wrapping up the summer with a beach vacation with my non-Jewish in-laws. They’re good people and real leftists who try to live the values they preach. This was a quality I admired, until the latest war in Gaza. Now they are adamant that American Jews need to take more responsibility for the deaths in Gaza. They are educated people who understand the political complexity, but I don’t think they get the emotional complexity of being an American Jew who is capable of criticizing Israel but still feels a deep connection to it. How can I get this across to them?"
  • “'I made a new friend,' my son told his grandfather later that day. 'I don’t know her name, but she was very nice. We met on the bus.' Welcome to Israel."
  • A Jewish female sword swallower. It's as cool as it sounds (and looks)!
  • Why did David Menachem Gordon join the IDF? In his own words: "The Israel Defense Forces is an army that fights for her nation’s survival and the absence of its warriors equals destruction from numerous regional foes. America is not quite under the threat of total annihilation… Simply put, I felt I was needed more in Israel than in the United States."
  • Leonard Fein's most enduring legacy may be his rejection of dualism: the idea that Jews must choose between assertiveness and compassion, between tribalism and universalism. Steven M. Cohen remembers a great Jewish progressive:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.