Make-believe Ethics

Published May 27, 2005, issue of May 27, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Here’s an ethical puzzle: Suppose you are the head of a major American institution that wields influence around the world. You come across what seems to be solid evidence of mischief-making in America’s relations with the Islamic world. The evidence isn’t airtight, but you go with it. The result, unanticipated, is mayhem: bloodshed beyond your worst imaginings, and grave damage to America’s image in the Muslim world and beyond. What do you do next?

If you’re the editor of Newsweek, and you’ve just published a damaging story about alleged desecration of the Koran, you go back and check your sources, and if it looks like you got it wrong, you admit it. You issue new guidelines to try and prevent such mistakes in the future. In penance, you publish reams of outraged letters from readers accusing you of everything from mendacity to treason.

If, on the other hand, you are the president of the United States, and you’ve just launched a war based on false weapons intelligence, you pretend not to notice that anything went wrong. You let your aides continue to insist the intelligence might yet prove true, while at the same time acting as though the weapons weren’t the reason for the war in the first place, regardless of what you said before. You launch a half-dozen investigations into the failures of those who gathered the intelligence, but block any attempt to look at how you used the intelligence.

And, as the war rages on, with the death toll steadily mounting and no end in sight, you continually praise your own wisdom for having dragged the country into the quagmire. You pretend we’re winning. And you act as though the mounting wall of Muslim suspicion and rage that America faces around the world were the fault of — who else? — the media.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Could Spider-Man be Jewish? Andrew Garfield thinks so.
  • Most tasteless video ever? A new video shows Jesus Christ dying at Auschwitz.
  • "It’s the smell that hits me first — musty, almost sweet, emanating from the green felt that cradles each piece of silver cutlery in its own place." Only one week left to submit! Tell us the story of your family's Jewish heirloom.
  • Mazel tov to Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky!
  • If it's true, it's pretty terrifying news.
  • “My mom went to cook at the White House and all I got was this tiny piece of leftover raspberry ganache."
  • Planning on catching "Fading Gigolo" this weekend? Read our review.
  • A new initiative will spend $300 million a year towards strengthening Israel's relationship with the Diaspora. http://jd.fo/q3Iaj Is this money spent wisely?
  • Lusia Horowitz left pre-state Israel to fight fascism in Spain — and wound up being captured by the Nazis and sent to die at Auschwitz. Share her remarkable story — told in her letters.
  • Vered Guttman doesn't usually get nervous about cooking for 20 people, even for Passover. But last night was a bit different. She was cooking for the Obamas at the White House Seder.
  • A grumpy Jewish grandfather is wary of his granddaughter's celebrating Easter with the in-laws. But the Seesaw says it might just make her appreciate Judaism more. What do you think?
  • “Twist and Shout.” “Under the Boardwalk.” “Brown-Eyed Girl.” What do these great songs have in common? A forgotten Jewish songwriter. We tracked him down.
  • What can we learn from tragedies like the rampage in suburban Kansas City? For one thing, we must keep our eyes on the real threats that we as Jews face.
  • When is a legume not necessarily a legume? Philologos has the answer.
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.