A Look Back at a Different Book Burning

History

By Zachary Silver

Published June 03, 2005, issue of June 03, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

Exactly 60 years ago, a group of individuals assembled to burn the prayer book of a Jewish leader and to ostracize him from community life. This event occurred not in Europe but in Manhattan, and the book burners were not Nazis. They were Jews.

On June 12, 1945, at New York City’s Hotel McAlpin, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis of the United States and Canada formally assembled to excommunicate from Judaism what it deemed to be the community’s most heretical voice: Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan, the man who eventually would become the founder of Reconstructionist Judaism. Kaplan, a critic of both Orthodox and Reform Judaism, believed that Jewish practice should be reconciled with modern thought, a philosophy reflected in his “Sabbath Prayer Book” — the target of the 1945 fire.

“Dr. Kaplan has published a new monster that was prepared in the name of a prayer book,” read the formal religious text of the excommunication decree against Kaplan. “Its contents were shown to the eye of every heretic and heresy before the God of Israel and the fields of the faith of Israel’s Torah.”

This was far from the union’s first attack on the eventual founder of Reconstructionism. Formed in 1902, and known in Hebrew as Agudat Harabbanim, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis sought to establish itself as the sole Jewish religious authority in America, the protector of Torah-true Judaism. It battled against the incorporation of secular society in religious life, seeking to seclude itself both geographically in an enclosed community in New York and in its theology.

Kaplan, on the other hand, based his entire career on establishing a pluralistic community for Judaism. Without such a collectivity, he felt that Judaism certainly would die in the modern era. Though representatives of right-wing Judaism had spent decades dealing with issues posed by Reform Judaism, the union saw Kaplan as the most visible representative of its fiercest threat: the Jewish Theological Seminary, where he had been ordained and sat on the faculty at the time. Founded by Orthodox rabbis in 1886, Conservative Judaism, which blended modern scholarship techniques with adherence to traditional religious doctrine, would become the most popular stream of Judaism in America during the postwar era.

Kaplan himself had moved among the denominations, assuming posts at the seminary as well as at Orthodox institutions — including such positions as the rabbi of Kehillat Jeshurun on the Upper East Side and the leader of the Jewish Center on the Upper West Side. Still, the Union of Orthodox Rabbi’s identification of Kaplan with the seminary was particularly ironic, since the seminary had done everything but fire Kaplan prior to 1945.

During the course of his life, Kaplan never really found a comfortable home for himself. On one side, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis launched a theological war against him. But even at the Jewish Theological Seminary, where he served on the faculty from 1909 to 1963, he was an outsider, and often privately considered leaving the institution. In 1941, the faculty illustrated its distaste with Kaplan by penning a unanimous letter to the professor of homiletics, expressing complete disgust with Kaplan’s “The New Haggadah” for the Passover Seder. Four years later, seminary professors Alexander Marx, Louis Ginzberg and Saul Lieberman went public with their rebuke by writing a letter to the Hebrew newspaper Hadoar, lambasting Kaplan’s prayer book and his entire career as a rabbi. Still, as far as the Union of Orthodox Rabbis was concerned, Kaplan was the most noted representative of a tower of heretics at the seminary.

And so, at the largest hotel in New York, the Union of Orthodox Rabbis brought one of the most traditional rituals into the modern era. With an audience of 200 rabbis, Israel Rosenberg, a member of the union, gave a formal speech that addressed Kaplan’s career of afflicting the American Jewish public. Eight rabbis then assembled a formal Jewish court and read the first Psalm, at which point an appointed individual burned a copy of the prayer book in accordance with a particular precedent outlined in the Talmud.

For Kaplan, who spent his entire life attempting to save modern Judaism, the event struck a deep chord.

“If I were asked what I regard as the most disheartening aspect in Jewish life as reflected in the tragicomedy of the herem, I would say that… we have rabbinical gangsters who resort to Nazi methods in order to regain their authority,” Kaplan wrote in his journal four days after the excommunication decree. “And on the other hand our Jewish journalists are cynical about the whole business and treat the very attempt to articulate religious values in terms of a modern outlook in life as silly and superfluous.”

In fact, the whole fracas turned out to be less about Kaplan’s increasing influence than the union’s decreasing influence. By 1945, the union’s rival, the Orthodox Union, already had taken control of American Orthodoxy, particularly in the realm of kashrut, the Jewish dietary laws. But the Conservative movement had also begun to make decisions about religious law, and this was something that the Union of Orthodox Rabbis could not allow.

Its strike against Kaplan boomeranged.

Ultimately the rabbis union issued an edict that was doomed to fail, one that represented the ideals of a group that did not wish to communicate with the time’s pluralistic society. In a pre-emancipated society, a herem devastated both the religious and communal aspects of an individual’s life. But in 20th century New York, Kaplan did not even have the obligation to abide by the technical religious terms of the excommunication decree.

Largely because of a New York Times article that publicized the event to the world, both Jews and the greater American public rallied behind Kaplan and lashed out against the Union of Orthodox Rabbis. It seemed that no one could stomach the sight of books on fire — no matter who had lit the match — only one month after the Allied victory over the Nazis.

Zachary Silver recently graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, majoring in history and Jewish studies.






Find us on Facebook!
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • Many #Israelis can't make it to bomb shelters in time. One of them is Amos Oz.
  • According to Israeli professor Mordechai Kedar, “the only thing that can deter terrorists, like those who kidnapped the children and killed them, is the knowledge that their sister or their mother will be raped."
  • Why does ultra-Orthodox group Agudath Israel of America receive its largest donation from the majority owners of Walmart? Find out here: http://jd.fo/q4XfI
  • Woody Allen on the situation in #Gaza: It's “a terrible, tragic thing. Innocent lives are lost left and right, and it’s a horrible situation that eventually has to right itself.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.