The Making of a Leader

By Jacob Neusner

Published July 08, 2005, issue of July 08, 2005.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The Catholics got it right. They choose a pope in secret. They mourn the last pope, collect the cardinals in seclusion, and poof — black smoke, black smoke, white smoke. Then everyone goes back to work.

But choosing a pope for a billion Catholics is one thing; choosing a chancellor for a million and a half Conservative Jews is another thing entirely.

The pope has a simple job description: being the pope. But being a chancellor, now that’s a complicated job. Head of a religious movement but not chief rabbi of Conservative rabbis, head of a rabbinical school but not principal in teaching and scholarship, fund raiser for an educational institution but responsible for religious organizations as well, primary on the American scene but involved with religious life in Canada, Russia, Argentina, Israel and elsewhere — the chancellor of the Jewish Theological Seminary has numerous responsibilities, with little power to carry them out.

If the outgoing chancellor, Ismar Schorsch, didn’t know it already, he’s quickly finding out now, as pretty much everyone in the movement is having a field day bashing him and his record. On his watch, Conservative Judaism lost its primary position in American Judaism, its West Coast school broke off from the center in New York City, the board of its Jerusalem school found itself dismissed, a huge deficit was discovered and then covered up, the principal professional representative of Conservative Judaism in Israel was discharged for lack of funds, and in general a malaise has descended over the movement.

But that was then. This is now.

When Schorsch-bashing loses its appeal, people will turn to naming names. That is, they will toss out names of candidates for the succession, thereby turning choosing a chancellor into an exercise in skeet shooting. This is nothing other than an excuse for lashon hara, for gossip about wannabe celebrities.

Then we’ll confront the issues people think will require resolution at just this time, in just this context. The debate on the ordination of gays and lesbians has sucked up all the oxygen in the chamber, as though that were the principal issue facing Conservative Judaism in America.

The position of candidates on the equalization of opportunity for women in the rabbinate runs a close second on the Web, as though any plausible candidate were opposed. And political acceptability — Schorsch was a liberal Democrat and is unlikely to be succeeded by a conservative Republican — runs third on the list.

None of this, of course, will help pick a leader who can steer Conservative Judaism back on course. So, what should choosing a chancellor require? Four questions demand answers, in this order.

First, what tasks does the next chancellor have to take up — or do people just want the same job done by a different player? Is it principally to be a religious leader? Academic administrator? Intellectual and scholarly authority? Chief judge in deciding issues of religious law and theology? International voice of a religious movement? Chief rabbi or not a rabbi at all? Or fund raiser, and the hell with everything else — as the American academy seems to have decided, to its loss?

Second, once you define the work to be done, you need to decide on the qualities a person must exhibit to do the job. If it is to be a religious voice, then piety takes precedence, and if an academic figure, then intellect registers. Gifts of the heart and soul endow the community and lift its spirit. And then there is the matter of experience: What in the person’s record will demonstrate the kind of leadership the chancellorship requires? Money follows vision: what vision of the future does this person offer?

Third, look at the records of the multitude of candidates who have yet to be named. Only when people define the tasks and what it takes to do them will specific types of persons come under discussion.

Must the next chancellor be an ordained rabbi? A publishing scholar? Experienced in administration of a large institution? A pulpit rabbi? Big pulpit or little pulpit? Florida, California or New York? A school principal? May a woman qualify? How much of a political player in the institutions of Conservative Judaism must the successor be — a major voice in the Rabbinical Assembly, for example, or an intellectual giant in public debate? Must the next chancellor be a Jewish Theological Seminary alumnus?

Fourth, specific names should now enter the debate, which should take place in private, among those chosen to find the successor and so inherit the crisis of tomorrow.

This is the kind of debate that will clarify the position of chancellor and sort out the candidates for it. If this process succeeds, Conservative Judaism will emerge stronger and better able to meet the challenges of the coming decades. It has already happened with other movements. Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion came up with David Ellenson, celebrated everywhere as a winner, and Yeshiva University found Richard Joel, who has already established a presence.

Can a declining religious movement take command of its future? We shall know the answer by what happens in the next ten months or so. This is the last chance.

Jacob Neusner, a rabbinical alumnus of the Jewish Theological Seminary, is a research professor of theology at Bard College.






Find us on Facebook!
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.