Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Life

The Polarizing Effect of the Proposed ‘Nakba Law’

So everyone is talking about the two-state solution. Whether you’re on the Israeli side or the Palestinian side, accepting it appears to be the very benchmark of moderation. Apparently that’s not quite how Fatah member Abbas Zaki, Palestinian Ambassador to Lebanon, sees it. “With the two-state solution, in my opinion, Israel will collapse,” he says in this television interview.


Israel is abuzz with discussion about the proposed “nakba law.” Yesterday, the Knesset’s Ministerial Committee for Legislative Affairs approved a bill that would ban events marking the “nakba,” the Arabic word for the events of May 1948 that roughly translates as “catastrophe.”

The bill, unsurprisingly, was initiated by a member of the right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu party, Alex Miller. Equally unsurprisingly, it has provoked condemnation on the left, including among Labor ministers — three of whom have filed an appeal with the government secretariat trying to block it.

Their appeal claims that the proposed law “harms the freedom of expression and freedom of protest, which are the basic principles of a democratic state. This kind of law will increase separatism and estrangement in the society and will strengthen the extremist minority among Israel’s Arabs.”

There was also opposition to the proposed law from some in Likud, including minister Michael Eitan, and ambivalence from Shas.

Interestingly, the opposition to this proposal has been far more marked than when Yisrael Beiteinu lawmakers tried unsuccessfully to ban two Arab parties from contesting the February general election — a move which, as the Forward reported here, was supported across a wide political spectrum.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.