As Opioid Lawsuits Pile Up, Met Decides To Refuse Money From Sacklers
The Temple of Dendur at the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Sackler Wing. Image by Getty/Allan Tannenbaum/Contributor
By PJ Grisar May 15, 2019
In a landmark development, New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, which has a decades-long connection to the Sackler family, the primary owners of Purdue Pharma, has decided to refuse future donations from family members connected to the business.
The move follows the Met’s previously announced plan to reconsider its donor policy after a Massachusetts court filing alleged that Purdue engaged in unethical business practices in distributing its painkiller OxyContin, including a Sackler-driven effort to blame the opioid crisis on victims. Now, The New York Times reports that the Met has revised its policy.
“The museum takes a position of gratitude and respect to those who support us, but on occasion, we feel it’s necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution’s interest,” Daniel H. Weiss, the president of the Met told The Times, noting that the “suspension” only applied to those family members and foundations closely connected to Purdue Pharma.
The Sacklers are among the Met’s most visible donors; their namesake wing in the museum contains the ancient Egyptian Temple of Dendur, one of the museum’s most famous holdings. And the Met is only the latest museum to refuse gifts from the Sacklers.
In March, in the space of a few days, three major institutions distanced themselves from the Sacklers amid the family’s ongoing legal battles. On March 19, London’s National Portrait Gallery announced its choice, made in consultation with the Sacklers, to revoke a £1m grant the family pledged in 2016. On March 21, the Tate galleries in London announced that it would no longer take donations from the Sacklers. And a day after the Tate’s announcement, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York, the site of a mass February “die-in” led by photographer Nan Goldin’s activist group P.A.I.N. Sackler, announced it would refuse further gifts from the family.
In a statement obtained by The Times, Sackler family members involved in the operations of Purdue Pharma said that “while the allegations against our family are false and unfair, we understand that accepting gifts at this time would put the Met in a difficult position.”
“We respect the Met and that is the last thing we would want to do,” the statement continued. “Our goal has always been to support the valuable work of such outstanding organizations, and we remain committed to doing so.”
Weiss told The Times that the decision to refuse gifts was made by the Met’s leadership with the agreement of the museum’s board. The board also decided to formalize the process by which proposals for named grants are reviewed.
At this time, the Met, which, according to The Times, received over $200,000 from Sackler family members in the last two decades, has no plans to rename the Sackler Wing.
PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture intern. He can be reached at [email protected]
The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.
Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.
At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.
This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a Passover gift today!
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Dive In
-
Books How a Jewish boy from Canterbury became a Zulu chieftain
-
Culture Jews thought Trump wanted to fight antisemitism. Why did he cut all of their grants?
-
Culture At a seder by and for trans Jews, guests define liberation for themselves
-
Culture ICE wants to treat deportations like a business – history warns us against that
Most Popular
- 1
Opinion My Jewish moms group ousted me because I work for J Street. Is this what communal life has come to?
- 2
Fast Forward Suspected arsonist intended to beat Gov. Josh Shapiro with a sledgehammer, investigators say
- 3
Fast Forward How Coke’s Passover recipe sparked an antisemitic conspiracy theory
- 4
Politics Meet America’s potential first Jewish second family: Josh Shapiro, Lori, and their 4 kids
In Case You Missed It
-
Opinion This Nazi-era story shows why Trump won’t fix a terrifying deportation mistake
-
Opinion I operate a small Judaica business. Trump’s tariffs are going to squelch Jewish innovation.
-
Fast Forward Language apps are putting Hebrew school in teens’ back pockets. But do they work?
-
Books How a Jewish boy from Canterbury became a Zulu chieftain
-
Shop the Forward Store
100% of profits support our journalism
Republish This Story
Please read before republishing
We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines.
You must comply with the following:
- Credit the Forward
- Retain our pixel
- Preserve our canonical link in Google search
- Add a noindex tag in Google search
See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.
To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.