Philip Roth Image by Getty/Frederick M. Brown/Stringer

By PJ Grisar October 6, 2020

On Thursday the Swedish Academy will determine its newest Nobel Laureate in Literature. Until today, that precise conversation — had several years ago — was probably the last time anyone was comparing Joan Didion and Philip Roth’s literary legacies.

Enter a new, viral TikTok where a young woman has claimed, “Philip Roth is Joan Didion for people who aren’t secure enough in their masculinity to read Joan Didion.”

“Phillip Roth is JOAN DIDION for people not secure in their masculinity to read Joan Didion” is maybe the most accursed sentence of pure stupidity I’ve heard in a while pic.twitter.com/3qYi4S4hNu

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

— Iva Dixit (@ivadixit) October 6, 2020

The world of literary Twitter responded with a resounding: Huh?

I mean, I guess they both write in English?

It’s hard to see how Didion, celebrated for her essays and journalism that penetrate everything from the Summer of Love to shopping malls to American and (regrettably) Salvadorian politics, can be compared to Roth, primarily a novelist whose perennial themes are the Jewish-American experience, the male libido and the foundering American dream. I suppose they share that last one, but what great American writer doesn’t?

Forgetting their completely different backgrounds (opposite coasts; transient, WASPY Didion; rooted, Jewish Roth), forms (Didion has a few novels, sure, but she’s known for her nonfiction) and styles, it’s worth looking at how others have used their work to style themselves.

These two can often be found together on a certain type of bookshelf. Both are known for being wry and erudite. And while Roth always projected a kind of working-class attitude in his canon— as opposed to the glamorous Didion, who wrote Hollywood screenplays and tagged along with The Doors in between nursing migraines — both generated books that were prized as status symbols. The two were contemporaries, who both resented the society that was their widest readership. Both were published in the New York Review of Books. ‘Nuff said.

Except Roth should have the last word here, re: this TikTok that is, at its core, about projecting a certain kind of straight, Millennial, masculine intellectualism.

Asked about the success of his novel “The Plot Against America,” Roth told LitHub in 2006 that sales don’t influence his work or his view of his readers.

“It doesn’t change my opinion of the cultural facts,” Roth said. “If it’s this book or Joan Didion’s book that strikes the fancy of people, it doesn’t change the fact that reading is not a source of sustenance or pleasure for a group that used to read for both.’”

PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture reporter. He can be reached at [email protected].

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’ve started our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we need 1,800 readers like you to step up to support the Forward by April 21. Members of the Forward board are even matching the first 1,000 gifts, up to $70,000.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism, because every dollar goes twice as far.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

2X match on all Passover gifts!

$90 → $180 $180 → $360

$360 → $720

Other amount