Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Art

The Nazis recorded everything they stole. One artist is mining their archives for something new.

Lisa Oppenheim’s solo exhibition inverts Nazi archival photos to make the absence of stolen objects and stolen lives feel tangible

It feels strange that the Nazis kept meticulous records of the objects and people they destroyed. Soldiers and guards noted the people they imprisoned, the supplies they were issued, how they died and even whether or not they had lice. And, of course, they recorded each possession they looted, neatly photographing paintings and sculptures, ceramics and even clothing for their archives.

These records, ironically, have helped to preserve the memory of the very people the Nazis sought to wipe out. Lisa Oppenheim, a 47-year-old multimedia artist from New York, dug into the archives for her new solo exhibition, “Spolia,” now on view at the Tanya Bonakdar Gallery in Manhattan. Redeveloping photos of items that have still never been found or restituted, Oppenheim brings light to the absence left in the wake of the Holocaust. 

“Spolia,” a term for the practice of repurposing building stones for new structures, features new images from the Nazis’ archived negatives. During the development process, Oppenheim used firelight to overexpose, or solarize, the photos. The result is a harsh, scorched inverse of the lost pieces, printed at the same scale as the originals but rendered in stark black shadows.

One of the pieces in “Spolia,” Entartete Kunst, Alpenlandschaft, 1937/2022 (Version II) 2022. Courtesy of Lisa Oppenheim

The idea of inversion is central to the show; in addition to the solarized photos, there’s also a slideshow of photos Oppenheim took of porcelain molds used to produce German ceramics the Nazis were obsessed with collecting.

“The porcelain is made from this pristine white clay from German soil,” she told me over the phone the day after I visited the gallery. “So it fit into their whole narrative.”

Instead of focusing on the actual lost artworks — the details of which are hard to make out in the scorched images — the exhibition emphasizes absence, not only of the works themselves but of their original owners.

“I’m not trying to remake these artworks as they were or replace them into the world,” Oppenheim said. Instead, she sees herself as “bringing light to these images that would otherwise never be seen” — quite literally.

Nature Mort, 1943/2022 (Version I), 2022. Courtesy of Lisa Oppenheim

Oppenheim was living in Munich when she first conceived of the exhibit. The central city served as a hub for Nazi loot, which was brought there for sorting and storage. As a Jew, Oppenheim says she felt drawn not to the Michelangelos and Van Goghs the Nazis stole but to more plebeian pieces — small silver household items, ceramics and still lifes that reminded her of her grandparents’ house and decor.

One beaded shawl described in the archives even sounded similar to one the artist bought at a flea market years earlier, and though it is almost certainly not the same one lost to Nazi looting, Oppenheim included an image of her shawl in the exhibit, emphasizing the idea that every object has an unknown backstory.

While many exhibitions on lost art focus on the value of the pieces that were looted, Oppenheim wanted to distance the viewer from the works themselves and instead focus on who owned each painting. She doesn’t even list the artists’ names or the pieces’ titles, just the day it was photographed for the Nazi records and the accompanying archival description. 

“I kind of wanted to leave the issue of authorship up in the air,” she said. “I didn’t use the title of the original painting. I was more interested in these as documentation images.”

Entartete Kunst, Marchen, 1937/2022 (Version I), 2022. Courtesy of Lisa Oppenheim

Despite Oppenheim’s attempt to sidestep the specifics of each individual piece, the works she chose were some of those that Nazis most wanted to save. While the Third Reich sold off or destroyed works of modernist and abstract art the regime considered degenerate, still lifes fit with Hitler’s emphasis on classicism and realism. Some of the pieces Oppenheim used were confiscated by the Nazis for inclusion in the Fuhrermuseum, a planned — but never realized — Nazi museum celebrating Hitler’s cultural and artistic ideals, filled with looted artwork. 

Still lifes by old masters, like those used in “Spolia,” fit perfectly with the Nazi artistic and cultural ideals. But it is in dialogue with this history that Oppenheim’s exhibit is most powerful. Her solarization technique inverts the classical, prosaic scenes into abstract, otherworldly images filled with abrupt lines and harsh shapes. It’s exactly the kind of thing the Nazis would have abhorred, and it feels like poetic justice.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.