Supreme Court sides with Jewish family in case over Nazi-looted art
Camille Pissarro’s “Rue Saint-Honoré, dans l’après-midi. Effet de pluie” Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
By Rudy Malcom April 21, 2022
For two decades, heirs to a German Jewish art dealer have been trying to get back a beloved painting looted by the Nazis during the Holocaust. On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled in their favor.
In 1939, Lilly Cassirer Neubauer surrendered the painting — “Rue Saint-Honoré, Apres Midi, Effet de Pluie” by the famed French-Jewish painter Camille Pissarro — to the Nazis in exchange for her being allowed to flee Germany. The Impressionist work from 1897, which she had inherited from her father, depicts grand avenues in modern Paris glistening during an afternoon rain.
In 2001, Neubauer’s grandson Claude Cassirer learned that the prized possession, now valued at more than $30 million, was, after a half-century of sales and trades, hanging in a Spanish museum. Since then, the Cassirer family has been fighting to regain the painting from the Thyssen-Bornemisza National Museum in Madrid.
The Cassirers have claimed that they rightfully own the painting under California law, where they brought the lawsuit. However, lower courts applied a Spanish law, which places a higher burden of proof on victims of art theft.
The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the property-law dispute could be debated in court in California, marking a tipping point for one of the longest-running looted art cases in American history.
“Our ruling is as simple as the conflict over its rightful owner has been vexed,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan, now the only Jewish member of the court, in the case of Cassirer Et Al. v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation.
Had the Supreme Court chosen to defer to Spanish law, current holders of Nazi-plundered art could have been emboldened in similar cases brought against other countries.
The ruling “also makes it more likely going forward that” in federal suits against foreign countries, “U.S. courts will apply state-law rules rather than foreign-law rules in contexts in which Congress hasn’t provided otherwise,” Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law, told CNN.
Claude Cassirer, who died in 2010, did not live to see the ruling. But it clears the way for his son, David, to try to reclaim the cherished painting, once displayed prominently in a gilded frame above a lush velvet settee in his great-grandmother’s Berlin apartment.
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.
In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.
At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.
Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we need 500 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Our Goal: 500 gifts during our Passover Pledge Drive!
