Jonathan Safran Foer and Natalie Portman Get Real About Veganism
Image by Getty Images
Image by Getty Images
Jonathan Safran Foer’s seminal work “Eating Animals” has a reputation that precedes it. “It’ll turn you into a vegan,” I was warned, repeatedly, when I started reading it. “It turned Natalie Portman into a vegan.”
While “Eating Animals” ultimately held less sway over me than a schnitzel baguette does, the book certainly made me feel guilty about eating that schnitzel baguette, so mission accomplished (and in the most Jewish way)?
But the rumors are true. Natalie Portman did become a vegan thanks to Foer’s magnum opus, even though Foer did not. He is a ‘flexitarian,’ which is a term I’ve discovered means a vegetarian who occasionally eats meat. In a new interview with the Los Angeles Times the two Jewish stars talked about everything from the evils of factory farming to being called pretentious over eating Impossible Burgers at a vegan restaurant.
Portman confessed that it was thinking about her future offspring that made her vegan. She also confessed that “The thing I hate most when you say you’re vegan is people trying to pick holes — like, “What if vegetables feel it when you bite into them? Don’t you know plants communicate with each other?” Is this how vegan people talk?
“On high school and college campuses, vegetarianism and veganism is an aspirational identity and has a political force behind it,” said Foer. An aspirational identity is a generous term for the folks who sit around the cafeteria giving the stink eye to anyone who chows down on some eggs benedict on their watch, but whatever.
If we all had the discipline of Natalie Portman, we would all be vegans like Natalie Portman. Not even Jonathan Safran Foer has the discipline of Natalie Portman. If only we could.
Shira Feder is a writer. You can reach her at [email protected]
A message from our CEO & publisher Rachel Fishman Feddersen
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.
We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.
If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
