Skip To Content

All The European Countries Where Kosher and Halal Meat Production Are Now Forbidden

A chicken walks loose before it is caught and killed at a factory in Jerusalem where chickens are slaughtered according to Jewish dietary laws. Image by Getty

A ban on the Jewish and Muslim methods of ritual slaughter of animals in Belgium’s northern Flemish region went into effect on January 1. The region’s capital is Antwerp, home to approximately 20,000 Jews.

This is just another step in a larger trend across Europe — which we’ve mapped out below, with individual restrictions and Jewish population numbers:

Data from Jewish Data Bank and Library of Congress. Map by Shira Feder.

These policies have been in the works for a while. In the European Union’s countries, the post-World War II discussion on ritual slaughter began with a 1998 directive titled the “European Convention for the Protection of Animals for Slaughter,” which required stunning before slaughter except in the case of religious slaughter. Because of this, some countries banned un-stunned ritual slaughter, which included both kosher and halal methods of ritual slaughter. This became a larger campaign, continent-wide. In 2004, the European Food Safety Authority wrote that “due to the serious animal welfare concerns associated with slaughter without stunning, pre-cut stunning should always be performed.” In 2009, the EU Slaughter Regulation permitted religious slaughter without stunning. Because there is no European Union-wide regulation on slaughter without stunning, individual countries have decided for themselves whether to permit or ban kosher slaughter.

The EU does not require meat from un-stunned animals to be labeled as such, at the moment, and while proposals have been made [for mandatory labelling ]( “for mandatory labelling “)120375_REV2_EN.pdf), they have been dismissed.

German activists publicly protest kosher slaughter. Image by Getty

World history is fraught with bans on kosher slaughter, extensively documented in Isaac Lewin’s “Religious Freedom: The Right To Practice Shehitah.” Countries like Switzerland, Sweden, Poland and Norway have all banned kosher slaughter at some point in history. In Germany, kosher slaughter was banned three months after Adolf Hitler was elected, and was subsequently banned in all Nazi-occupied countries, like Italy and Hungary. The bans were removed after the war ended.

What makes kosher slaughter different from non-kosher slaughter?

  • Kosher slaughter, known as shechita in Hebrew, involves using a sharp knife to cut open an animal’s trachea and esophagus in a motion quick enough to limit the animal’s pain and kill it immediately. When it comes to kosher slaughter, the animals cannot be stunned before they are killed. When people (often animal rights activists) talk about restricting kosher slaughter, they are talking about un-stunned stunned versus un-stunned animals, and arguing that killing animals without stunning them should not be allowed.
  • Stunning animals pre-slaughter has been common practice since the early 20th century, and is considered the least painful way to slaughter.
  • Some think kosher slaughter is inhumane, some think restricting it is anti-Semitic, some think bans on kosher slaughter are against Article 9 of the European Convention, and some think it is the least cruel way to kill an animal, including animal rights activist Temple Grandin, who called the method “relatively pain free.”

Shira Feder is a writer. She’s at [email protected] and @shirafeder

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.