Skip To Content

A Charlie Sheen Comeback?

A Charlie Sheen comeback? Argh! For me, year 2092 would be too soon.

Admittedly, I never much admired him for his acting chops, nor can I say I found the good ol’ boys dynamic of “Two and Half Men” very funny. But even if he had the charm of a Paul Rudd mixed with the sensitivity of a Colin Firth, I would still not be ready for his return.

Image by Wikicommons

Sheen, in case you forgot, was fired from “Two and a Half Men,” last year after he made an anti-semitic remark about the show’s creator and lead writer Charles Levine. Sheen called him “Chaim Levine,” and said, in a mostly nonsensical rant, that he had magically turned his “his tin cans into pure gold.”

This guffaw followed a few years of steady unraveling in the public eye. Sheen challenged the US government’s account of September 11, and, on one particularly belligerent evening, caused $7000 worth of damage to a Plaza hotel room.

Oh, and then there is the fact that in 2009 he was arrested for domestic abuse after his now ex-wife Brooke Mueller filed charges. Apparently Sheen held a knife to his then wife’s throat on Christmas Day. His previous ex-wife, Denise Richards, also made allegations that Sheen physically threatened her. (For a full inventory on Sheen’s questionable behavior towards women, including his love of prostitutes, child porn, and the numerous other abuse charges filed against him, check out Jezebel’s round up here.)

So what does Hollywood reward him with? A shiny, shiny comeback! (And by shiny, I mean lucrative.) Sheen returns next week on a new FX sitcom called “Anger Management.”

In a recent New York Times profile of the actor so comfortingly titled, “Repentant? No Way, Man,” Sheen discusses his new series and his fall from grace.

The writer, Dave Itzkoff, maintains an air of skepticism on his subject which I appreciated. “There is an unpredictable and uneasy energy to being around Mr. Sheen for even a short while; you are never sure if you’re his new best friend, his audience or his hostage,” Itzkoff writes. Though all in all, Itzkoff’s reference to Sheen’s bad boy ways were kept mostly vague, and his victims out of sight. It wasn’t until the 11th paragraph that Sheen’s domestic abuse charges were mentioned, and the antisemitic comment didn’t come up at all.

Clearly, the Hollywood players behind Sheen’s comeback have even less interest in the actor’s unsavory past than the Times.

Despite the calamitous months in Mr. Sheen’s life that preceded this arrangement, Lionsgate felt it was important to get into business with him quickly. “Otherwise, given how popular and successful he is, Charlie probably wouldn’t have a need for us, honestly,” said Kevin Beggs, president of Lionsgate’s television group. “He could get a pilot anywhere, for a huge premium.”

Oh, and finding performers to join Sheen on the series was apparently no problem either. Both actress on the show, Shawnee Smith and Selma Blair (who is Jewish), both claimed that they were too busy mothering their children to follow the controversy surrounding Sheen. Uh-huh.

While antisemtism doesn’t make me bristle too much, the idolation of someone who is so nonchanlaneltly intolerant does. And then there is the fact that he was violent towards his wife. I need to say it again. Violent towards his wife! And still, America, or at least Hollywood, can’t wait for his return?

Really, what kind of message are we projecting as a society when we so casually welcome Sheen back into our pop culture realm? Sheen seems to take some kind of sick pride in his lack of repentance for actions that I thought were universally condemned this day in age. Sadly, it seems like I thought wrong.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.

In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.

At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.

Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.