Donald Trump, Lena Dunham, and Why the ‘Persona’ is a Bad Fit For Politics by the Forward

Donald Trump, Lena Dunham, and Why the ‘Persona’ is a Bad Fit For Politics

Image by Getty Images

As anyone with even the most fleeting familiarity with the news cycle knew would happen, Lena Dunham has now offered an apology for her remarks about wishing she’d needed and had an abortion.

Yes, we are all sick of hearing about Dunham’s antics. Yes, I’m conflicted about keeping her in the news cycle. But there’s a part of her apology that has fairly, shall we say, yuge significance for understanding our times:

“My words were spoken from a sort of ‘delusional girl’ persona I often inhabit, a girl who careens between wisdom and ignorance (that’s what my TV show is too) and it didn’t translate.”

This “persona” assertion is important. Why? Because it tells us that there’s no clear line between the fictional Hannah Horvath, Dunham’s entitled protagonist on “Girls,” and the ostensibly real person who stumped for Hillary Clinton. What Dunham is telling us is that her entire (public) life is performance art, and that we have no good way of knowing when we’re getting the real her. Does she mean the latest outrageous thing she said? Who knows!

Sound familiar? Hint: He just won the presidency.

Ethically, I’d rather if the Democrats didn’t engage in persona politics. Strategically, I can understand why they tried. Personally, I wish they hadn’t, and would hope they wouldn’t do so in the future. But it seems unlikely, in the current cultural and political climate, that featuring a celebrity persona along those lines, who maybe means what she’s saying and maybe doesn’t, but is at any rate offering up the id (or unpleasant person version) of a certain percent of the electorate, was what cost them the election.

Donald Trump, Lena Dunham, and the Danger of ‘Persona’ Politics

Donald Trump, Lena Dunham, and the Danger of ‘Persona’ Politics

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at Her book, The Perils of “Privilege”, will be published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017.

We Need Politicians, Not ‘Personas’


Phoebe Maltz Bovy

Phoebe Maltz Bovy is a former editor of the Sisterhood blog at the Forward. Her writing has appeared in several publications, including The New Republic and The Atlantic. Her book, “The Perils of ‘Privilege,’” was published by St. Martin’s Press in March 2017. She has a PhD in French and French Studies from New York University, and has read a lot of 19th century French Jewish newspapers for a 21st century American.

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Donald Trump, Lena Dunham, and Why the ‘Persona’ is a Bad Fit For Politics

Thank you!

This article has been sent!