The Hourglass Physiques Of The 1917 Forverts
Ad for Dove UK limited edition body wash Image by YouTube Screenshot
Dove UK is catching some online criticism for a curious promotional stunt: It’s promoting a “limited edition” series of body wash bottles, in six different shapes, meant to represent the various forms of women’s bodies. Which is nice and all but… why? At The Pool, Amy Jones explains that these bottles are not filling an unmet niche in the market:
I don’t think anyone in the history of the world has thought, “You know what would make me feel a lot more empowered? If I could pretend I was squeezing my soap out of a tiny-scale model of my own body”
Correct. And as Ian Bogost points out in The Atlantic, the bottles would if anything prompt the woman purchasing them to remember whichever body image concerns, at a time (buying soap) when one normally is thinking of other things (namely, buying soap). And yet, it’s an outrage story. It’s coverage. I have, in writing this, unavoidably reminded you of the existence of the brand in question.
The controversy might make you nostalgic for a time uncorrupted by advertising, and by unrealistic expectations of women’s physiques. Surely 100 years ago, our foremothers had no such concerns!
Not quite.
Wonderlift corset ad, 1917. Image by Forward Association
A Forverts ad from 1917, showcasing “Wonderlift” corsets, offered women a century ago the option of looking hourglass, hourglass, or hourglass. (Or as it’s known today, like the body-wash-shaped Dove body wash container.) The main part of the ad depicts three women, of subtly different builds, cinched to approximations of the same. They’re just sort of standing there, together, as corseted women are wont to do (?), the tall one in the middle smiling gently. “Uplifting support seated or standing” promises an inset image zooming in on the… corset-covering areas of a seated woman wearing a corset.
Image by Forward Montage
Have things for women improved, body-image-wise, in this, the (mostly) post-corset age? When en route to the Forward offices today, I pass a gym promising a workout that “lifts your seat.” I don’t not own Spanx.
What comes through, then, is an advertising universal: reminding women of our bodies, and any anxieties we may have about them, sells.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news this Passover. All donations are being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give this Passover is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
