Skip To Content

Ivanka, Can You Really Be ‘Blindsided’ By Fightback Against Trump?

As has probably been clear for some time now, I make no claims of being able to know what’s going on in Ivanka Trump’s mind. (Or anyone’s, for that matter, but this is an Ivanka post.) So I ask the following questions, knowing, full well, their unanswerability: Did she actually think, at any point along the way, that the entire American public would greet Donald Trump’s presidency with understated joy? Did she ever imagine a President Donald Trump would bring about a new, refined era in American political discourse? A break from mean-spirited rhetoric?

I ask because I’m trying to make sense of Ivanka’s “Fox & Friends” remarks, specifically:

“There’s a level of viciousness that I was not expecting.”


“Some of the distractions and some of the ferocity, I was a little blindsided by on a personal level.”

This is pure Ivanka as lifestyle brand. I keep returning to this idea because this is, I think, her contribution to the administration.

A lifestyle brand is a criticism-free space, behind a pretty and uncontroversial façade. If you can’t say anything nice and all that. The positivity requirement has been known to rankle even where all that’s at stake is whether you should buy a lifestyle blogger’s new line of rompers or whatever; how exactly is it supposed to play out as applied to national politics? But lifestyle brands can work magic. It’s just not kind to do anything that would hurt Ivanka’s feelings. Right?

Let’s get something clear, once and for all: It’s not call-out culture if the person being called out is a high-up political operative. Ivanka is not some random person whose unfortunately-phrased tweet has gone viral. She’s someone who can go on “Fox & Friends” and refer to the Trump administration as “we.”

When Trumpism is criticized, the Trumps are criticized. That doesn’t mean lines can’t be crossed. (As in, Barron Trump is a child and didn’t choose his parents, so let’s leave him out of memes, and the limelight more generally.)

But it does mean an expectation of positivity or neutrality is not just unrealistic but altogether inappropriate. Knowing what Ivanka is selling is the first step towards not buying it.

Phoebe Maltz Bovy edits the Sisterhood, and can be reached at [email protected]. She is the author of “The Perils Of ‘Privilege’”, from St. Martin’s Press. Follow her on Twitter, @tweetertation


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.