Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
News

Explainer: Does the Black Lives Matter Platform Single Out Israel?

A recent Black Lives Matter platform described Israel as “an apartheid state” committing “genocide,” drawing fire from Jews across the spectrum.

“The US justifies and advances the global war on terror via its alliance with Israel and is complicit in the genocide taking place against the Palestinian people,” the statement reads.

Does it really single out Israel? Here’s what you need to know:

Who released the platform?

1. The Movement for Black Lives, a coalition of more than 50 groups, fighting for the rights of black people and against policy brutality published the platform on Monday, “to articulate and support the ambitions and work of Black people” and “assert a clear vision” of its worldview.

What is the platform?

2. It contains six kinds of goals and demands. “Invest-divest,” is the section that contains the controversial statement on Israel. Others include: “End the war on black people,” “Reparations,” and “Political power.”

3. The “invest-divest” section focuses on domestic issues but also addresses U.S. aid to Israel and argues for a cut in military spending.

What does it say about Israel?

4. It singles out Israel as the recipient of $3 billion in U.S. aid, calling it “a state that practices systematic discrimination and has maintained a military occupation of Palestine for decades.”

5. The platform seems to imply that Israel benefits from military aid to Egypt. It invokes the fact that together the two countries receive close to 75% of U.S. aid money, and claims that Egypt is “Israel’s most important regional ally.”

6. The platform devotes a whole paragraph to Israel, in which it criticizes Israel’s “genocide” against the Palestinians, calls it “an apartheid state with over 50 laws on the books that sanction discrimination against the Palestinian people” and claims the Jewish state arrests Palestinians as young as 4 years old.

7. It does not specifically call for addressing human rights abuses in or a cut in aid to Egypt.

8. The document criticizes the U.S. requirement that Israel spend three quarters of its military aid on U.S.-produced arms, arguing that it supports “hundreds of arms corporation, who then wage lobbying campaigns pushing for even more foreign military aid.”

What does the platform say about foreign policy in other countries?

9. The section on military policy identifies 25 countries by name, in which it says the American foreign policy has a negative effect, but Israel is the only country criticized for its domestic policy.

10. The countries mentioned include 17 in Africa, two in Central America, one in South America, four in the Middle East and one in the Caribbean.

11. It promotes shifting government spending from military aid to domestic development, arguing that U.S. wars hurt black people across the world: “America is an empire that uses war to expand territory and power. American wars are unjust, destructive to Black communities globally and do not keep Black people safe locally.”

Who is the Movement for Black Lives working with on this?

12. Out of the 11 groups listed as advancing “invest-divest” goals, three of them are primarily dedicated to advancing Palestinian rights or opposing Israel’s military occupation, including Israeli human rights group Adalah, the U.S. Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, and the pro-Palestinian group the Institute for Middle East Understanding.

What do Jewish groups think about this?

13. Some Jewish allies have denounced the platform. T’ruah: The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights, a longtime supporter of the Black Lives Matter Movement, said it was “extremely dismayed at the decision to refer to the Israeli occupation as genocide,” a statement.

14. Others have embraced it. Pro-Palestinian group Jewish Voice for Peace wrote on Twitter that it “endorses the Movement for Black Lives platform in its entirety, without reservation.”

Contact Josefin Dolsten at dolsten@forward.com or on Twitter, @JosefinDolsten

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and the protests on college campuses.

Readers like you make it all possible. Support our work by becoming a Forward Member and connect with our journalism and your community.

Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly. 

— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at editorial@forward.com, subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.

Exit mobile version