Skip To Content

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
Back to Opinion

Yes, Trump Finally Denounced Anti-Semitism. But Is It Enough?

President Trump has finally, after too long a time, denounced and distanced himself from the cascading anti-Semitism that is being directed at Jewish communities around this country. Here’s why his remarks today, first on television and then at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, are so necessary. And why they might not be enough.

After brushing away repeated opportunities and oftentimes compounding his silence with something worse, Trump finally said the right thing: “The anti-Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community and community centers are horrible, and are painful, and a very sad reminder of the work that still must be done to root out hate and prejudice and evil.” And he said those words in the right place — a new museum that recounts the horrible, painful past of once enslaved African Americans, thus rooting anti-Semitism in a broader phenomenon of hate against minorities in America.

There are many explanations for why he took so long, why he didn’t comprehend that the lame attempts by his administration and his family to issue a statement or a tweet would never suffice. As my colleague Josh Nathan-Kazis wrote on Friday, he may well have been wary of offending the anti-Semitic strain of the “alt-right.” Or lack moral understanding. Or he may have been angry at being labeled.

And, of course, he was shamefully given a pass by none other than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who stood next to Trump at a press conference last week and allowed him to evade a pointed question on the topic.

Image by Getty Images

Of all people, Netanyahu should know why a leader’s denunciation of anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry is so important: because the elected leader is speaking on behalf of the government, the state. And what the victims of prejudice fear most is the enshrining of hate, the time when a government turns a blind eye or, worse, codifies discrimination and implements it.

Personally, I believe that there will always be a deep-seated intolerance of the “other” in all societies, because it is baked into our human DNA, a mechanism used to divert attention from the real causes of inequality, displacement, struggle and sorrow. Human societies rely on that individual tendency to be overwhelmed by empathy and countered by the belief that we are all, indeed, equal — in God’s eyes, if that’s your faith, or in the eyes of the government that serves us in a democracy.

So while there may be a small but unfortunately sturdy sliver of Americans who hate Jews, we can rest a lot easier if the government, through its leaders, is forcefully opposed. It’s the difference between French government officials denouncing terrorism directed at Jews and others in 2015 and French government officials enforcing Nazi laws through the Vichy government in the early 1940s.

This is why Trump’s belated statement is so necessary. Not simply to make Jews feel assuaged or appeased, but because the president is indicating that the full weight of his office condemns these hateful actions, be they bomb threats to Jewish community centers, vandalism of Jewish cemeteries, harassment of Jewish journalists or worse.

Now comes the next, equally necessary step. As important as it is to denounce, Trump now has to ensure that the mechanism of government doesn’t discriminate either. Plenty of public officials decry racism, but there are too many times when the arm of government — law enforcement, the courts, etc. — ignores the directive. Words must be backed up by behavior.

Unfortunately, the Trump administration has so far done the opposite, and enshrined prejudice in its immigration policy. It’s not enough to decry anti-Semitism if the White House continues to issue edicts that discriminate. It’s not enough to speak out against hatred of Jews if hatred of Muslims or Mexicans or refugees underlies federal policy.

For this Jew, the president’s words, however welcome, will remain empty sentiments unless they lead to genuine change. We are waiting.

Contact Jane Eisner at [email protected] or on Twitter, @Jane_Eisner


Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.