Jewish Commentators Analyze The Comey Hearings by the Forward

Jewish Commentators Analyze The Comey Hearings

Image by Getty Images.

As the dust settles following James Comey’s highly-anticipated Senate hearing, many commentators are trying to decipher the content of Comey’s testimony and what it foretells about the investigation into the Trump campaign’s links to Russia. Here is what some prominent Jewish writers have said so far.

Andrew Rosenthal, New York Times:‘Lordy, I Hope There Are Tapes’

New York Times columnist Andrew Rosenthal expressed even further alarm after Comey’s testimony. Rosenthal is now convinced that that Trump “abused his power,” framing Trump’s efforts as solely motivated by self-interest and absent of decorum and respect for institutional norms.

Jonathan Turley, The Hill:Sorry Dems, Comey’s Words Too Weak To Impeach Trump

Law professor Jonathan Turley views Comey’s testimony as surely damning of Trump’s character, but supportive of the president’s case against being impeached. Trump allowed the Russia investigation as a whole to move forward, he points out, and simply “hoping” Comey would let Flynn go is not grounds for obstruction of justice.

Jewish Commentators Analyze The Comey Hearings

Julian Zelizer, CNN:Comey Hearing’s Bottom Line: WE Can’t Trust Trump

Princeton historian Julian Zelizer puts Comey’s accusations of Trump lying in context, noting the multiple instances presidents have been accused of lying. However, Zelizer sees Trump’s problem with the truth as “qualitatively different in scale and scope.” Trump’s behavior doesn’t suggest a problem contained within the given situation, says the scholar, but a much larger issue of the lack of character within the Oval Office.

Alan Dershowitz, Fox News:Comey Confirms That I’m Right — And All The Democratic Commentators Are Wrong

The Harvard professor and commentator believes that Comey’s hearing validated his long-standing belief that Trump’s actions regarding the Flynn investigation are compliant with the norms and limits of the presidency. The Democrats’ argument that Trump’s actions were obstruction of justice remains a political ploy, Dershowitz maintains, and should be set aside unless the ongoing Russia investigation uncovers tangible evidence of collusion or obstruction.

Steven Davidson is an editorial fellow at The Forward.

Jewish Commentators Analyze The Comey Hearings

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Jewish Commentators Analyze The Comey Hearings

Thank you!

This article has been sent!