Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.
Back to Opinion

Letter | Your ‘Pro-Israel’ Response Just Proved My Point

In his reply to my article, Aaron Kalman first takes issue with my characterization of the “Independent Arab” state described in the 1947 UN Partition Plan as a “Palestinian state.” I do not regard this as an error. The independent Arab state would have served Arab Palestinians, thus calling such an entity a Palestinian or Arab-Palestinian state is perfectly reasonable.

Second, Mr. Kalman’s assertion that an Israeli-Jordanian plan to squelch an independent Arab-Palestinian state, had it materialized, would have been technically consistent with the UN Partition Plan is irrelevant to the argument I was actually advancing, which was about the Zionist leadership’s supposed willingness to allow for the Arabs of Palestine to rule themselves. I concluded by saying that looking at that period through the lens of Zionist generosity and Palestinian rejectionism was too simplistic. I maintain this view.

I agree with Mr. Kalman that Arab states were the ones to declare war on Israel in 1948 and that this is important historical context for the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem. It does not, however, absolve the Zionist leadership of their embrace of population transfer, which preceded the invasion by Arab states, or the deliberate expulsions of civilians that took place during the war. These are still facts that Zionists, including myself, should recognize without obligatory deflection.

Finally, in citing the 1967 Khartoum Resolution and later negotiations between Israel and the P.L.O., I’m afraid it appears Mr. Kalman responded to my article as I imagine he would to any piece he deemed “anti-Israel”: by defensively citing examples of Palestinian intransigence, regardless of their relevance. In writing my piece, I hoped to overcome this exact tendency when confronted with the reality of the Nakba.

Abe Silberstein is a freelance commentator on Israeli politics and U.S.-Israel relations. His work has previously been published in the New York Times, Haaretz, +972 Magazine and the Forward.

A message from our Publisher & CEO Rachel Fishman Feddersen

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning, nonprofit journalism during this critical time.

We’ve set a goal to raise $260,000 by December 31. That’s an ambitious goal, but one that will give us the resources we need to invest in the high quality news, opinion, analysis and cultural coverage that isn’t available anywhere else.

If you feel inspired to make an impact, now is the time to give something back. Join us as a member at your most generous level.

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

With your support, we’ll be ready for whatever 2025 brings.

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.