Image by Getty Images

In his reply to my article, Aaron Kalman first takes issue with my characterization of the “Independent Arab” state described in the 1947 UN Partition Plan as a “Palestinian state.” I do not regard this as an error. The independent Arab state would have served Arab Palestinians, thus calling such an entity a Palestinian or Arab-Palestinian state is perfectly reasonable.

Second, Mr. Kalman’s assertion that an Israeli-Jordanian plan to squelch an independent Arab-Palestinian state, had it materialized, would have been technically consistent with the UN Partition Plan is irrelevant to the argument I was actually advancing, which was about the Zionist leadership’s supposed willingness to allow for the Arabs of Palestine to rule themselves. I concluded by saying that looking at that period through the lens of Zionist generosity and Palestinian rejectionism was too simplistic. I maintain this view.

I agree with Mr. Kalman that Arab states were the ones to declare war on Israel in 1948 and that this is important historical context for the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem. It does not, however, absolve the Zionist leadership of their embrace of population transfer, which preceded the invasion by Arab states, or the deliberate expulsions of civilians that took place during the war. These are still facts that Zionists, including myself, should recognize without obligatory deflection.

Forwarding the News

Thoughtful, balanced reporting from the Forward and around the web, bringing you updated news and analysis each day.

Terms(Required)

I agree to the Forward's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Email(Required)

Finally, in citing the 1967 Khartoum Resolution and later negotiations between Israel and the P.L.O., I’m afraid it appears Mr. Kalman responded to my article as I imagine he would to any piece he deemed “anti-Israel”: by defensively citing examples of Palestinian intransigence, regardless of their relevance. In writing my piece, I hoped to overcome this exact tendency when confronted with the reality of the Nakba.

Abe Silberstein is a freelance commentator on Israeli politics and U.S.-Israel relations. His work has previously been published in the New York Times, Haaretz, +972 Magazine and the Forward.

The Forward is free to read, but it isn’t free to produce

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward.

Now more than ever, American Jews need independent news they can trust, with reporting driven by truth, not ideology. We serve you, not any ideological agenda.

At a time when other newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall and invested additional resources to report on the ground from Israel and around the U.S. on the impact of the war, rising antisemitism and polarized discourse.

Readers like you make it all possible. We’re near the end of our Passover Fundraising Drive, and we have a very ambitious goal of $127,000 by April 21.

This is a great time to support independent Jewish journalism you rely on. Make a Passover gift today!

—  Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO

Make a Passover Gift Today!

$90 $180

$360

Other amount