Skip To Content
JEWISH. INDEPENDENT. NONPROFIT.

Support the Forward

Funded by readers like you DonateSubscribe
Back to Opinion

Bernie Sanders is our best hope for peace between Israelis and Palestinians

Former Vice President Joe Biden may be the frontrunner in the Democratic presidential primaries, but the race has already largely been shaped by another candidate: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, whose domestic policies represent the most progressive economic platform in generations.

Like Hillary Clinton in 2016, the former vice president has a clear advantage over Sanders on foreign policy and national security — issues that will receive increasing scrutiny as the general election approaches.

But Sanders has something Biden doesn’t: He is as bold on foreign policy as he is on economics, pledging to prioritize human rights and diplomacy as Commander in Chief. From the War on Terror to US support for Saudi Arabia, he has for decades challenged the Washington consensus. A Sanders presidency would have a profound impact on an array of American foreign policy issues.

This is no less the case in respect to US leadership on Israel-Palestine. In this arena, the diplomatic efforts of the last two administrations have been defined by animosity. President Obama’s relationship with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was strained, and Trump’s one-sided pro-Israel agenda has made it a point to antagonize Palestinians, moving the embassy to Jerusalem, withdrawing aid to the Palestinians, recognizing other disputed territories as part of Israel and proposing a peace plan without Palestinian input.

This contrasts with the achievements of Jimmy Carter, and later Bill Clinton, who brought Israel and its adversaries together for peace talks. Clinton’s Camp David summit ended without a deal but made huge strides toward one.

And Sanders’ neutral approach is reminiscent of Clinton’s, calling for Israeli and Palestinian leaderships to once again sit down for negotiations.

While Sanders lacks Biden’s White House experience, he does have a personal perspective unlike any presidential contender. Having grown up in an immigrant family affected by the Holocaust, and having lived on an Israeli kibbutz as a young man, Sanders’ view of the conflict is distinctly influenced by his Jewish identity and recognition of anti-Semitism. His viewpoint is in line with the labor and liberal Zionist traditions, which believe in a secure Palestinian state as much they do in a democratic, multicultural Jewish homeland.

Though he would be the first Jewish president, Sanders would undoubtedly receive a frosty reception from Benjamin Netanyahu, whose policies he has condemned as racist and reactionary. Nor has he endeared himself to the Israeli right by boycotting AIPAC conferences, or by condemning humanitarian suffering in Gaza and West Bank annexation plans, and suggesting that US military aid could be used as leverage for Israel to change course and enter peace talks.

But Sanders has no less harshly deplored terror attacks in Israel by the likes of Hamas, and as sympathetic as he is to the Palestinian cause, he also unequivocally defends Israel’s right to exist — rejecting a more radical one-state solution on this basis. His commitment to restore US aid to the Palestinian Authority is tempered by a critique of its corruption and links to extremism, which suggests he might use aid to also leverage the Palestinian leadership, too.

Over his 30 years in the US Congress, Sanders has built a reputation for being a pragmatic and effective negotiator who, despite his bad-tempered public image, is able to compromise and work across party lines. As much as Sanders is an idealist, he is also a realist in his pursuit of overarching goals.

Sanders is well-prepared to be the next Bill Clinton. His strategic abilities are accompanied by an even-handed, and compassionate, view of both sides and their national histories.

Of course, he might have more success if a leader like Benny Gantz — who has shown openness to fresh peace talks with the PA — were to replace Netanyahu. But there is nothing in Sanders’s record to suggest he would back down from tougher discussions.

The task at hand cannot be underestimated, but Sanders has proven himself to be an ideal candidate for the role of peacemaker.

Jacob Richardson is a freelance writer based in the U.K. You can follow him on Twitter @jjarichardson.

Engage

Republish This Story

Please read before republishing

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free, unless it originated with JTA, Haaretz or another publication (as indicated on the article) and as long as you follow our guidelines. You must credit the Forward, retain our pixel and preserve our canonical link in Google search.  See our full guidelines for more information, and this guide for detail about canonical URLs.

To republish, copy the HTML by clicking on the yellow button to the right; it includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to the Forward. It does not include images; to avoid copyright violations, you must add them manually, following our guidelines. Please email us at [email protected], subject line “republish,” with any questions or to let us know what stories you’re picking up.

We don't support Internet Explorer

Please use Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Edge to view this site.