As important as it is to have women in present, it cannot keep our shuls closed. by the Forward

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

Image by Getty Images

Dear Editor,

As an Orthodox rabbi and someone who takes the role of women in prayer extremely seriously, I was dismayed by Rabbi Dov Linzer’s recent article To my fellow Orthodox Jews: Don’t open shuls until you can open them to women, in which Rabbi Linzer contends that Orthodox shuls in New York State should not reopen until the government raises the attendance limits above the present number of ten, so that a minyan of men along with a gathering of women can together participate in services.

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

Rabbi Linzer postulates that Modern Orthodox Jews’ search for the “proper balance between tradition and modern values” places the halachic definition of a minyan — i.e. ten men — at odds with contemporary egalitarian values. Rabbi Linzer argues that the phenomenon of women in rabbinic roles in liberal Modern Orthodox synagogues has been an outgrowth of this inner conflict in Modern Orthodoxy.

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

But for Orthodox Jews, prayer needs to occur at certain times, in a certain order, with a certain text and with certain participants. It is not up to us to make changes to suit our preferences. Take, for example, the Priestly Blessing, recited (in the Diaspora) during the prayer service on Jewish holidays, and bestowed by male Kohanim, whose halachic “Kohen” lineage has not been compromised. I would love to ascend the bimah and participate in this blessing, but alas I do not qualify.

It’s a good analogy for minyan attendance, which is mandatory for males above bar mitzvah age. Halacha does provide exceptions, such as impossibility due to distance, or health reasons. But the absence of a female presence is not one of these exceptions.

Although our Orthodox shuls are very welcoming to women’s attendance, such attendance is halachically optional, and it is eminently clear in all halachic literature that a minyan may not be canceled due to the inability of women to be present.

These are legal, halachic issues; social considerations, as noble as they are, do not play a role, just as the rule against non-Kohanim does not permit me to bestow the Priestly Blessing from the bimah, as beautiful, meaningful and inspirational as I feel it would be for me to do so. My egalitarian drives play no role when it comes to this — or all other halachic practice.

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

As Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik explained, we are bidden by halacha to surrender our personal values and comportment in deference to the Torah, the Word of God. Shul attendance is not a self-serving or a populist experience, but is service of the Divine - Avodah, on terms other than our own. This is a paramount and defining feature of Orthodox tradition.

Sincerely,

Avrohom Gordimer

Rabbi Avrohom Gordimer is chairman of the Rabbinic Circle at the Coalition for Jewish Values, and he is a frequent contributor to a host of Jewish publications. He is also a member of the Rabbinical Council of America and the New York Bar. By day, he works as an account executive at a large Jewish organization based in Manhattan.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

Author

Avrohom Gordimer

Avrohom Gordimer

Rabbi Avrohom Gordimer is a kashrut professional, whose articles about Torah topics and issues in contemporary Orthodoxy are featured in many publications, including Israel National News, Cross-Currents, Times of Israel and Yated Neeman.

Your Comments

The Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. All readers can browse the comments, and all Forward subscribers can add to the conversation. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Forward requires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not and will be deleted. Egregious commenters or repeat offenders will be banned from commenting. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and the Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Recommend this article

Letter | We must attend shul whether or not women are present

Thank you!

This article has been sent!

Close