End of Long Jewish Era for Garment Union


By Nathaniel Popper

Published April 22, 2009, issue of May 01, 2009.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The annual commemoration of the infamous Triangle Shirtwaist fire has long been a chance for the leaders of the old Jewish garment unions to come out and memorialize the Jewish roots of the labor movement.

The commemoration went ahead as scheduled on March 27 — with the names of the 147 fire victims being read off to the tolling of a fire bell — but this year, for the first time, the Jewish head of the historically Jewish garment workers union was missing. Bruce Raynor, the general president of Unite Here, was too busy dealing with the dissolution of his union to make it to the site of the fire near Washington Square Park in Manhattan.

In the weeks before the event, Raynor had been pushing for the breakup of a marriage gone bad between his old labor group, the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees (UNITE), and the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union (HERE).

In a way, Raynor’s absence from the Triangle fire commemoration was fitting, because it appears that one result of the infighting is that for the first time in history, the head of the venerable garment workers union will not be Jewish. With the breakup, a new union, known as Workers United, is set to carry on the banner of the garment unions under the presidency of Edgar Romney, an African American.

If the breakup is finalized, Unite Here will continue to represent restaurant and hotel workers.

This will not end the role of Jews in the union’s leadership. Workers United has voted to become a constituent group of the Service Employees International Union, led by the most famous Jewish labor leader of today — Andy Stern. While union insiders say that Raynor is likely to receive a top position within the SEIU, many labor watchers say that the ascension of Romney is a welcome change in a union where the membership is now predominantly black, Latino and Asian.

“There’s something to be said for the leaders reflecting the actual members,” said Rabbi Michael Feinberg, head of the Greater New York Labor-Religion Coalition, and a speaker at the Triangle fire event. “That, to me, is a natural succession.”

While Unite Here is steeped in labor lore, the current fighting is a product of very modern trends in the labor movement. Raynor and John Wilhelm, head of HERE, are both Ivy League-educated organizers renowned for leading a renewed commitment to organizing workers.

“They both changed the playing field for unions in this country,” said Kate Bronfenbrenner, a professor at Cornell University’s School of Industrial and Labor Relations.

Since merging, the two leaders have battled over the best strategy for bringing new members into their merged union.

UNITE is the lineal descendant of the legendary, heavily Jewish apparel unions, the International Ladies Garment Workers Union and the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, which merged in 1995. Both of these unions gained momentum from the Triangle fire in 1911, when 147 female workers — mostly Jewish and Italian immigrants — perished due to locked exits that blocked their escape from a cramped sweatshop.

The marriage between UNITE and HERE in 2004 was an effort to complement their respective strengths, fusing UNITE’s considerable financial assets but relatively lower membership base with cash-starved HERE’s growing membership rolls. Together, they brought together some 450,000 active members. But their divergent cultures — UNITE, a strongly centralized, top-down organization, and HERE, a highly decentralized group with strong rank-and-file input — did not prove easy to reconcile.

The divorce has not been amicable. Wilhelm’s camp sued Workers United in an effort to keep it from peeling off, and then to keep it from taking assets that previously had been a part of the joint union.

UNITE brought an unusually hefty dowry to the 2004 merger, thanks, in large part, to the vision upheld by the two predecessor unions from which it was formed. In 1922, that vision — a commitment to the social, cultural and financial empowerment of its members — led an earlier incarnation of the men’s garment union to form what is now the only union-owned bank in the United States. Amalgamated Bank has been a major point of contention in the division of Unite Here.

The garment unions have long dealt with the issue of a demographic disjoint between their membership and leadership. While the ILGWU had a predominantly female membership, it never had a female leader. After World War II, as the Jewish membership in the garment unions fell off, the unions were accused of not allowing the new black and Latino members into top leadership positions.

“These Jewish men never gave up the top ranks of the union, even as their membership demographics stopped being Jewish,” said Daniel Katz, a labor historian at Empire State College.

The Triangle fire event reflected the new demographics, with the longest speech coming from a Hispanic laundry worker who was cheered on by Asian workers waving signs for Workers United. Ed Vargas, who filled in for Raynor at the event, said that whatever the leadership, at least some of the old Jewish traditions will persist.

“What Europeans brought to the United States was a style of community organization that a lot of the labor movement built its foundations on,” Vargas said. “That is a foundation and a legacy that came from a lot of Jewish folks and that is still a part of what we do today.”


To read a story from our archives that features Bruce Raynor discussing the Jewish legacy of the union that represents garment workers, click here.


Share your own experiences with organized labor or your opinions about the Employee Free Choice Act at www.forward.com or by emailing labor@forward.com.


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.