The Biggest McMansion of Them All

Mogul Planned 90,000-Sq. Ft. Faux Versailles in Florida

Hall of Mirrors, Fla.: David Siegel wanted to build an opulent palace for his young wife, Jackie, and their growing family. Then the real estate bubble burst.
lauren greenfield
Hall of Mirrors, Fla.: David Siegel wanted to build an opulent palace for his young wife, Jackie, and their growing family. Then the real estate bubble burst.

By Curt Schleier

Published July 16, 2012, issue of July 20, 2012.
  • Print
  • Share Share
  • Single Page

(page 2 of 2)

The daughter of university professors who ultimately divorced, Greenfield was born in Boston and grew up in the Venice Beach area of Los Angeles. After high school she majored in visual anthropology at Harvard, and decided to pursue photography after several unsuccessful attempts to get into film school.

Her first major project was a series of photographs of French aristocracy inspired by a stay with an uppercrust family during a high school year abroad. Coming from Los Angeles, where social class is defined by money, she was fascinated by a society where status is determined by heritage. Lauren’s “French mother” provided her with an entree into the French aristocratic world, where she photographed their “social rituals, dances and coming out parties.” It was the antithesis of the Siegels, who grew up lower-middle class and later became wealthy.

The result was a well received and widely toured photography exhibit called “Survivors of the French Revolution” that established Greenfield’s career. It was followed in 2002 by “Girl Culture,” a book of photographs that became the basis of her first documentary, “Thin,” about women, body image and eating disorders. Two shorter documentaries, photo books and touring exhibits came after, as well as magazine assignments like the one where she met Jackie Siegel.

In “The Queen of Versailles,” Jackie comes off sympathetically — an innocent without artifice who says whatever comes to mind. When the Westgate business and the world economy go south, Jackie is forced to lay off 15 of her staff. She says she never would have had all of her children if she knew one day she’d be down to just three nannies. It sounds terrible, but the woman is completely oblivious to the impact of her words — including what her children will think when they hear them.

The film is replete with similar examples. Forced to give up her private jet, Jackie flies on a commercial airline to her hometown of Binghamton, N.Y. When handed the keys to a Hertz rental car, she asks the befuddled clerk for the name of her driver. Simply put, she is a naive visitor to Planet Reality from the solar system Über-Wealthy.

David, on the other hand, appears more arrogant. Why did he build a 90,000-square-foot house? “Because I could,” he says. Unlike his wife, he’s not oblivious to how that sounds. He is a self-made man who always gets what he wants when he wants it. Because he’s wealthy, he feels entitled to it. His ego is as large as the house he wanted to build. And as for the masses? Let them eat cake.

After the film was completed, Siegel didn’t like the way Greenfield portrayed the decline of his fortunes, so he sued her. He claims that she edited scenes out of the sequence in which they were shot, and made it seem as though the company was going under and that Versailles was kaput. Siegel refused the Forward’s requests for an interview, and calls were referred to Sitrick and Company, a public relations agency. The Sitrick representative said that Westgate has never been more profitable — because it is privately held, that is impossible to confirm — and that construction on Versailles will resume this month. Meanwhile Greenfield claims that Siegel’s “allegations are false” and notes that Jackie was recently with her promoting the film.

But why did the Siegels allow her into their lives in the first place? During the course of shooting the film, Greenfield visited (and usually stayed with) the family around a half-dozen times. At some point it should have been obvious that the couple and their lifestyle were not coming off well. The house was carpeted in dog feces because the pets were never trained to go outside. Before the layoffs, there was always a staffer around to pick up after them. (According to a recent article in The New York Times, Siegel claimed that the problem was caused by the fact that one of the dogs had cancer.) Worse, one of the Filipino nannies lived in a child’s playhouse in the back yard and hadn’t seen her own children in 11 years.

“I think David was proud of building the biggest house in America. But I think it was more Jackie’s thing,” Greenfield posited to explain the access they gave her. “I think she liked me and liked the attention and liked being in front of the camera. Also, I think she was proud of what she accomplished and where she was in life.”

Greenfield treats the couple with surprising sympathy considering their excesses. “I try to be non-judgmental when I’m working,” she said. “I’m more interested in ‘Why is this happening?’ and ‘What does it say about us?’ I don’t want to idealize them, either. What was interesting about them is that in some ways they represented both the virtues and the flaws of the American dream.”

Though Greenfield is Jewish — she’s in early stages of planning her son’s bar mitzvah next year — and so, it seems, are the Siegels, she said that she didn’t consider portraying Jews as the vulgar nouveau riche. “I started the story about Jackie and religion wasn’t part of the equation,” she said. “I never let [being Jewish] influence me in my projects.”

“Queen of Versailles” may not have Jewish significance for Greenfield, but she also said its message is applicable not just to the super-rich. “It really is a morality tale about overreaching,” she said. “I think their story shows the consequences of going too far; it’s a lesson not just for rich people, but for all of us.”

Curt Schleier is a freelance writer who teaches business writing to corporate executives.

“The Queen of Versailles” opens July 20 in New York and Los Angeles and across the rest of the country throughout July and August.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight":
  • Jon Stewart responds to his critics: “Look, obviously there are many strong opinions on this. But just merely mentioning Israel or questioning in any way the effectiveness or humanity of Israel’s policies is not the same thing as being pro-Hamas.”
  • "My bat mitzvah party took place in our living room. There were only a few Jewish kids there, and only one from my Sunday school class. She sat in the corner, wearing the right clothes, asking her mom when they could go." The latest in our Promised Lands series — what state should we visit next?
  • Former Israeli National Security Advisor Yaakov Amidror: “A cease-fire will mean that anytime Hamas wants to fight it can. Occupation of Gaza will bring longer-term quiet, but the price will be very high.” What do you think?
  • Should couples sign a pre-pregnancy contract, outlining how caring for the infant will be equally divided between the two parties involved? Just think of it as a ketubah for expectant parents:
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.