Stunning Nazi-Looted Art Find Reignites Question of German Restitution

Why Did Officials Keep Lid on Billion-Dollar Trove?

Stunning Find: A novelist discusses the significance of the artworks discovered in Cornelius Gurlitt’s Munich apartment. Why did authorities stay so quiet about the $1.3B trove for so long?
getty images
Stunning Find: A novelist discusses the significance of the artworks discovered in Cornelius Gurlitt’s Munich apartment. Why did authorities stay so quiet about the $1.3B trove for so long?

By Allison Amend

Published November 20, 2013, issue of November 29, 2013.
  • Print
  • Share Share

The recent revelation that German authorities discovered a treasure trove of presumed-lost masterpieces of art in the dingy apartment of a Nazi art dealer’s son has reignited the complicated issue of reparations almost 50 years after Germany declared its job of restitution complete.

Though the legal ramifications are byzantine, it appears that officials have a mere moral obligation to research and return these works of art to their owners or, as most are likely deceased, to the owners’ descendants.

The statue of limitations expired long ago, though the 1998 multinational agreement known as the Washington Principles demands that “every effort should be made to publicize art that is found to have been confiscated by the Nazis and not subsequently restituted in order to locate its pre-War owners or their heirs.” Additionally, this effort should be “taken expeditiously to achieve a just and fair solution.”

Almost two years have elapsed since the raid of Cornelius Gurlitt’s apartment, and only now has the German magazine Focus revealed the extent of the haul: more than 1,400 pieces — some masterpieces that were presumed lost, and some for which no record exists.

German officials cite the complications of the investigation (which focused initially on customs violations, then on tax fraud) as a reason for the delay: They still aren’t convinced that a crime has taken place, and they do not know Gurlitt’s current whereabouts.

This, however, is just the latest example of German reluctance to own up to its ongoing problem of finding a rightful home for art stolen during World War II. Earlier this year, the magazine Der Spiegel revealed that a rug in Prime Minister Angela Merkel’s office was part of the “Collection Goering.” The sitting German president’s desk is among objets seized by Hans Posse, a Nazi administrator. The magazine reported that over 600 items currently housed in government-owned properties were seized by the Nazis.

It’s understandable that officials would rather keep these discoveries quiet, as they bring up not only painful memories, but also real costs in research and lawsuits to a Europe not especially flush right now. Additionally, sorting out the tangled web of ownership will not be an easy undertaking. But it is essential that Germany, and other European governments and museums, complete the unpleasant task of researching the provenances of all artworks lost, stolen, sold under duress, or otherwise acquired in the years surrounding the Second World War.

Why does it matter after all these years? Art, of course has symbolic value, as evidenced by the fact that people pay millions of dollars for canvas, some paint and a fancy frame. The Nazis understood its value, which is why, after labeling modern art “degenerate,” they seized it, exhibited it and protected it, even as the Allies closed in. If art is a means of expression, then a society’s masterpieces are the expression of humanity itself.

Lives stolen by fascist regimes cannot be returned. Art can.

It is tempting to sweep it all under the rug. But how did that rug get acquired in the first place?

Allison Amend is the author of “Things That Pass for Love” (OV Books, 2008) and “Stations West” (Louisiana State University Press), which was a finalist for the 2011 Sami Rohr Prize. Her most recent book is “A Nearly Perfect Copy” (Nan A. Talese/Doubleday).


The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.





Find us on Facebook!
  • This is what the rockets over Israel and Gaza look like from space:
  • "Israel should not let captives languish or corpses rot. It should do everything in its power to recover people and bodies. Jewish law places a premium on pidyon shvuyim, “the redemption of captives,” and proper burial. But not when the price will lead to more death and more kidnappings." Do you agree?
  • Slate.com's Allison Benedikt wrote that Taglit-Birthright Israel is partly to blame for the death of American IDF volunteer Max Steinberg. This is why she's wrong:
  • Israeli soldiers want you to buy them socks. And snacks. And backpacks. And underwear. And pizza. So claim dozens of fundraising campaigns launched by American Jewish and Israeli charities since the start of the current wave of crisis and conflict in Israel and Gaza.
  • The sign reads: “Dogs are allowed in this establishment but Zionists are not under any circumstances.”
  • Is Twitter Israel's new worst enemy?
  • More than 50 former Israeli soldiers have refused to serve in the current ground operation in #Gaza.
  • "My wife and I are both half-Jewish. Both of us very much felt and feel American first and Jewish second. We are currently debating whether we should send our daughter to a Jewish pre-K and kindergarten program or to a public one. Pros? Give her a Jewish community and identity that she could build on throughout her life. Cons? Costs a lot of money; She will enter school with the idea that being Jewish makes her different somehow instead of something that you do after or in addition to regular school. Maybe a Shabbat sing-along would be enough?"
  • Undeterred by the conflict, 24 Jews participated in the first ever Jewish National Fund— JDate singles trip to Israel. Translation: Jews age 30 to 45 travelled to Israel to get it on in the sun, with a side of hummus.
  • "It pains and shocks me to say this, but here goes: My father was right all along. He always told me, as I spouted liberal talking points at the Shabbos table and challenged his hawkish views on Israel and the Palestinians to his unending chagrin, that I would one day change my tune." Have you had a similar experience?
  • "'What’s this, mommy?' she asked, while pulling at the purple sleeve to unwrap this mysterious little gift mom keeps hidden in the inside pocket of her bag. Oh boy, how do I answer?"
  • "I fear that we are witnessing the end of politics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. I see no possibility for resolution right now. I look into the future and see only a void." What do you think?
  • Not a gazillionaire? Take the "poor door."
  • "We will do what we must to protect our people. We have that right. We are not less deserving of life and quiet than anyone else. No more apologies."
  • "Woody Allen should have quit while he was ahead." Ezra Glinter's review of "Magic in the Moonlight": http://jd.fo/f4Q1Q
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?




















We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.