Painting Inspires Dialogue Between Jews and Catholics in Poland

Small Town of Sandomierz Celebrates Day of Judaism

A New Dialogue: The bishop of Sandomierz and the chief rabbi of Poland pray together at a Jewish cemetery.
Courtesy of Magda Teter
A New Dialogue: The bishop of Sandomierz and the chief rabbi of Poland pray together at a Jewish cemetery.

By Magda Teter

Published March 07, 2014, issue of March 07, 2014.
  • Print
  • Share Share
  • Single Page

(page 2 of 2)

Since the end of World War II, despite the efforts to revive the Jewish community, there has been no Jewish community that would have been an inseparable part Poland’s everyday reality the way it had been for centuries until 1939. Thus the memory about Jews and about that gone-forever past is located in the lieux de mémoire, such as Kazimierz, the Jewish part of Cracow, Poland, Auschwitz and other death camps, and also the Sandomierz painting. They all became powerful sites of memory.

Yet, memory and associated with it lieux de mémoire necessarily simplify the past, heighten emotions, and mute the past’s different colors, shades and textures. In Poland, the recollection of intensified ant-Semitism during the interwar periodand the destruction of the Jews during World War II influenced the reading of the Sandomierz painting, reducing it to a symbol of a much simplified version of a much richer Polish-Jewish past. The 18th-century representation of blood libels in Sandomierz became tied up with the more recent past, engendering polemics and emotions on all sides. This made it difficult to engage not only with the history of the painting and the events behind it, but also with the larger topic of Jewish-Christian relations.

The Sandomierz painting seems to have made the dialogue between Jews and Christians in Poland more challenging. On the one hand, well-meaning people, many of them devout Catholics committed to Jewish-Christian rapprochement, called for the painting’s removal, and even, in extreme cases, destruction, or at the very least a proper description to accompany its display, informing the viewers that the painting did not represent true events, but rather anti-Jewish fantasies — the last was the position taken by members of the Jewish community. On the other hand, many Polish Catholics, including some high profile members of the clergy, dug their heels, refusing to denounce the events of almost 300 years ago, angering both Jews and Poles ashamed of the dark past in Polish-Jewish relations.

But the controversy over the painting was not really about its 300-year-old past. The long stalemate could certainly be attributed to the fact that for both the Poles and the Jews, the painting was not a representation of a long-gone history, but a symbol of contemporary Polish anti-Semitism. The long-festering controversy over the painting did not make anyone feel good — not Jews, who felt the painting’s presence in a cathedral church without any explanation legitimized historical blood libels and was evidence of continuing Polish anti-Semitism, and not the Catholic church, nor the local population, which became associated with and tainted by the broad notion of Polish and Catholic anti-Semitism.

January 16, 2014 seemed to mark a turning point in the long rankling controversy and the almost two-decade-long stalemate. The celebration of the Day of Judaism and the uncovering of the controversial painting with a proper and prominently displayed description was greeted with a sigh of relief by all. Due credit was given to Sandomierz Bishop Krzysztof Nitkiewicz,and Chief Rabbi of Poland Michael Schudrich who called the unveiling of the controversial painting and the new plaque “a wise solution,” and emphasized that Jewish-Catholic relations had never been better than they were now. To be sure, those efforts at rapprochement have been taking place since the Second Vatican Council, and for the last two decades or so in Poland, but in Sandomierz, they had never succeeded in breaking the stalemate. And here a case can be made for historians lending a hand in difficult to overcome situations. (Full disclosure, I was one of the participating historians in Sandomierz.)

A year before the historic celebration of the Day of Judaism in Sandomierz, a smaller gathering took place just steps from the Cathedral. Scholars from Poland and the United States discussed questions of the history and historiography of Jewish-Christian relations, Jews in Christian art, and the local context for the divisive painting, in a symposium called “Jewish-Christian Relations in History, Memory, and Art: European Context for the Paintings in the Sandomierz Cathedral.” The symposium was a fruit of an unprecedented collaboration between the Diocese of Sandomierz, and especially Bishop Nitkiewicz, and an American academic institution. After meeting the bishop in the summer of 2012, we began planning the symposium, co-sponsored by my home institution, Wesleyan University. On a cold January day in 2013, when the cobbled streets of the beautiful town were lightly covered by snow, we traced Sandomierz iconography to its Italian roots, notably to the history and iconography of Christian martyrologies, and to the iconography of the most notorious example of a blood libel, the 1475 case of Simon of Trent. What the symposium succeeded in doing was to help untangle the past from the present and find language to discuss the painting openly, as a work of its time and place.

A year later, the young clerics would sing Hebrew songs, and a bishop would deliver a moving homily marking the Day of Judaism 2014 — in the very cathedral that had been a source of tension for years.

Magda Teter is a professor of history and Jewish Studies at Wesleyan University.

The Jewish Daily Forward welcomes reader comments in order to promote thoughtful discussion on issues of importance to the Jewish community. In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, The Jewish Daily Forwardrequires that all commenters be appropriately respectful toward our writers, other commenters and the subjects of the articles. Vigorous debate and reasoned critique are welcome; name-calling and personal invective are not. While we generally do not seek to edit or actively moderate comments, our spam filter prevents most links and certain key words from being posted and The Jewish Daily Forward reserves the right to remove comments for any reason.

Find us on Facebook!
  • Move over Dr. Ruth — there’s a (not-so) new sassy Jewish sex-therapist in town. Her name is Shirley Zussman — and just turned 100 years old.
  • From kosher wine to Ecstasy, presenting some of our best bootlegs:
  • Sara Kramer is not the first New Yorker to feel the alluring pull of the West Coast — but she might be the first heading there with Turkish Urfa pepper and za’atar in her suitcase.
  • About 1 in 40 American Jews will get pancreatic cancer (Ruth Bader Ginsberg is one of the few survivors).
  • At which grade level should classroom discussions include topics like the death of civilians kidnapping of young Israelis and sirens warning of incoming rockets?
  • Wanted: Met Council CEO.
  • “Look, on the one hand, I understand him,” says Rivka Ben-Pazi, a niece of Elchanan Hameiri, the boy that Henk Zanoli saved. “He had a family tragedy.” But on the other hand, she said, “I think he was wrong.” What do you think?
  • How about a side of Hitler with your spaghetti?
  • Why "Be fruitful and multiply" isn't as simple as it seems:
  • William Schabas may be the least of Israel's problems.
  • You've heard of the #IceBucketChallenge, but Forward publisher Sam Norich has something better: a #SoupBucketChallenge (complete with matzo balls!) Jon Stewart, Sarah Silverman & David Remnick, you have 24 hours!
  • Did Hamas just take credit for kidnapping the three Israeli teens?
  • "We know what it means to be in the headlines. We know what it feels like when the world sits idly by and watches the news from the luxury of their living room couches. We know the pain of silence. We know the agony of inaction."
  • When YA romance becomes "Hasidsploitation":
  • "I am wrapping up the summer with a beach vacation with my non-Jewish in-laws. They’re good people and real leftists who try to live the values they preach. This was a quality I admired, until the latest war in Gaza. Now they are adamant that American Jews need to take more responsibility for the deaths in Gaza. They are educated people who understand the political complexity, but I don’t think they get the emotional complexity of being an American Jew who is capable of criticizing Israel but still feels a deep connection to it. How can I get this across to them?"
  • from-cache

Would you like to receive updates about new stories?

We will not share your e-mail address or other personal information.

Already subscribed? Manage your subscription.