ADL Criticizes ‘Blue Lives Matter’ Bill That Would Make Police Shootings a Hate Crime
Image by Getty
By Josh Nathan-Kazis August 10, 2016
A new bill that would make it a hate crime to attack a police officer in New York State has drawn opposition from the Anti-Defamation League, which drafted the hate crime laws now in place in many states across the country.
According to the ADL, the proposed law would make it harder for prosecutors to make cases against people who attack police. In a statement, the ADL’s New York Regional Director, Evan Bernstein, said that the law would be “harmful.”
The bill, proposed in the New York State Assembly by Ronald Castorina, a Republican representing parts of Staten Island, would be among the first nationwide to protect a profession under hate crime laws, which were created to stiffen penalties for crimes motivated by racial and ethnic bias. A similar bill, also opposed by the ADL, was recently signed into law in Louisiana.
“The Blue Lives Matter bill will provide our Police Officers with greater protection against assault because of the heightened penalties associated with this legislation,” Castorina said in a statement. “People will now think twice before they assault a Police Officer with the knowledge that they could be charged with a ‘hate crime’.”
The text of Castorina’s bill has not yet been made public.
Castorina’s proposal comes during a summer of heated rhetoric over race and policing. In his statement announcing the bill, Castorina cited the July shooting deaths of five police officers in Dallas, and the shooting deaths, days later, of three officers in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Assaulting a police officer in New York State already carries extra-stiff penalties. Tacking on hate crime designations, according to Castorina, would go even farther to increase attackers’ potential jail sentences.
Yet the ADL believes that Castorina’s proposal would backfire.
The ADL has led the development of hate crimes statues across the United States for decades. Forty-three states have adopted hate crime laws based on or similar to model legislation that the ADL drafted in 1983.
In a June blog post arguing against the new Louisiana Blue Lives Matter bill, the ADL noted that the inherent weaknesses of hate crime laws would make hate crime cases involving police more difficult to prosecute. Hate crime laws, the group wrote, would require that the prosecutors prove that the defendant attacked a police officer because they were a police officer. Otherwise, the hate crime charges won’t stick.
“That additional intent requirement, which is not included in existing laws covering attacks on police officers, would make prosecutions more difficult, not easier,” the organization wrote.
The ADL also argued in the blog post that including police as a class protected by hate crime laws “confuses the purpose” of hate crime legislation.
Contact Josh Nathan-Kazis at [email protected] or follow him on Twitter, @joshnathankazis.
This is a moment of great uncertainty. Here’s what you can do about it.
We hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, we’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s independent Jewish news. All donations are still being matched by the Forward Board - up to $100,000 until April 24.
This is a moment of great uncertainty for the news media, for the Jewish people, and for our sacred democracy. It is a time of confusion and declining trust in public institutions. An era in which we need humans to report facts, conduct investigations that hold power to account, tell stories that matter and share honest discourse on all that divides us.
With no paywall or subscriptions, the Forward is entirely supported by readers like you. Every dollar you give is invested in the future of the Forward — and telling the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
The Forward doesn’t rely on funding from institutions like governments or your local Jewish federation. There are thousands of readers like you who give us $18 or $36 or $100 each month or year.
Support our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
