Polish Politician Dissed Holocaust Commemoration — Then Sued The Curator Who Commissioned It
The Monument to Struggle and Martyrdom and the Mausoleum at a former concentration camp in the now State Museum at Majdanek, Lublin, Poland. Image by Getty/Chuck Fishman/Contributor
By PJ Grisar December 12, 2019
Continuing a trend, in Poland, of political objections to artwork concerning the country’s role in the Holocaust, a nationalist Polish governor is suing an art curator for defamation.
The row began in October, Art Newspaper reported, when a public artwork by Dorota Nieznalski commissioned by Lublin-based art historian and curator Tomasz Kitliński was unveiled during Lublin’s Open City Festival.
The work, titled “Judenfrei” — the Nazi term for an area “cleansed” of Jews — commemorates World War II-era pogroms in the city. Nieznalski’s installation took the form of a heap of signs bearing the names of Jewish population centers in Lublin where Nazis conducted mass murders and roundups of Jews in the early 1940s.
Lublin’s governor and an incoming member of Polish parliament, Przemysław Czarnek, ordered the removal of the work on state television, calling it “anti-Polish.” Kitliński refused to budge. Soon after, Czarnek received an honorary medal from Marie Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin. Kitliński, who teaches at that institution, did not mince words about his feelings on this development.
“The governor of Lublin Region prides himself in offending Ukranians, Muslims, the LGBT community and women, for whom he sees no social role other than the reproduction of children,” Kitliński wrote in an online open letter, according to Art Newspaper.
Czarnek’s defenders responded with outrage; the religious radio station Radio Maryja — an entity that has been condemned by the Anti-Defamation League and the Catholic Church — called Kitliński anti-Polish. And Czarnek himself sued Kitliński for defamation for the online post.
Should Kitliński be found guilty, he may face up to two years in prison for slandering a public official.
Since 2018, when the governing nationalist party in Polish parliament voted to make suggesting Polish complicity in the Holocaust illegal, displays like Nieznalska’s have been controversial. Indeed, associating Poland with any historical acts of anti-Semitism is risky.
Dariusz Stola, the director of Polin, Poland’s Jewish museum, recently ran afoul of the government, first by objecting to the 2017 law about Polish involvement in Nazi crimes, and then for producing an exhibition about the country’s 1968 anti-Semitic purges. (The museum’s stakeholders convened a panel to find a new director and Stola won the votes to resume his duties, but the Polish minister of culture, who needs to formally reinstate him due to the government’s sponsorship of the museum, has yet to reappoint him.)
More recently, Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki issued a public demand addressed to Netflix CEO Reed Hastings insisting that the streaming provider relabel maps of concentration camps in Poland included in the documentary series “The Devil Next Door,” to clarify that German Nazis built and operated the camps.
“In Poland, there has been an official ban on criticizing historical memory for a long time,” Niesznalska wrote to Artnet News in an email. “In this case, of course, it was a denial of the fact that the Poles pogromed the Jewish community during or just after World War II.”
“I’ve been made a scapegoat for all progressive causes that the far-right despise, and feel personally threatened,” Kitliński told Art Newspaper after Czarnek filed suit. “By accusing me they intend to send a signal of intolerance to the population at large.”
But Kitliński has a coalition of fellow art professionals in his corner. An online petition with over 770 signatories, including academics and art world celebrities, appeared online in support Kitliński, echoing his criticisms of Czarnek and calling Czarnek’s honorary medal “a blatant attempt to normalize misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia and racism.”
For his defense in the lawsuit, Kitliński will claim his constitutionally-protected right to free speech.
“This represents an attempt to close down free speech and open discourse on human rights,” he told Art Newspaper.
PJ Grisar is the Forward’s culture fellow. He can be reached at [email protected]
I hope you appreciated this article. Before you go, I’d like to ask you to please support the Forward’s award-winning journalism this Passover.
In this age of misinformation, our work is needed like never before. We report on the news that matters most to American Jews, driven by truth, not ideology.
At a time when newsrooms are closing or cutting back, the Forward has removed its paywall. That means for the first time in our 126-year history, Forward journalism is free to everyone, everywhere. With an ongoing war, rising antisemitism, and a flood of disinformation that may affect the upcoming election, we believe that free and open access to Jewish journalism is imperative.
Readers like you make it all possible. Right now, we’re in the middle of our Passover Pledge Drive and we still need 300 people to step up and make a gift to sustain our trustworthy, independent journalism.
Make a gift of any size and become a Forward member today. You’ll support our mission to tell the American Jewish story fully and fairly.
— Rachel Fishman Feddersen, Publisher and CEO
Join our mission to tell the Jewish story fully and fairly.
Only 300 more gifts needed by April 30
